ackground: style='font-family:Verdana;'>Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and urinary tract infections (UTI) during pregnancy may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcome'/> Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women with and without Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—A Case-Control Study
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Mellitus >Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women with and without Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—A Case-Control Study
【24h】

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women with and without Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—A Case-Control Study

机译:患有糖尿病和妊娠期糖尿病的孕妇中的无症状细菌和尿路感染MELLITUS-A病例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

>B style="font-family:Verdana;">ackground: style="font-family:Verdana;">Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and urinary tract infections (UTI) during pregnancy may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes style="font-family:Verdana;">. style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;"> Diabetes mellitus (DM) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are considered to be important additional risk factor for ASB and UTI during pregnancy. style="font-family:Verdana;">Aims: style="font-family:Verdana;"> To investigate differences in prevalence of ASB and incidence of UTI in pregnant women with and without DM and GDM to inform ASB screening and treatment policies. style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods: style="font-family:Verdana;"> Data from 214 pregnant women who gave birth during 2010 at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia where cases were women with a clinical diagnosis of (G)DM and controls were matched on date of birth. ASB was defined as the growth of at least 10e5 colony forming units/ml of one organism or any presence of group B streptococcus (GBS) at the first urine culture collected during pregnancy without complaints of a UTI. A clinical UTI was diagnosed by the treating physician, in combination with a positive urine culture it was defined as culture-confirmed UTI. style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: style="font-family:Verdana;"> No significant differences in prevalence of ASB (5.6% and 3.7%; relative risk (RR) 1.50; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.44 style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">- style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">5.17), incidence of clinical UTI (4.7% and 11.2%; RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.15 style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">- style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">1.14) or culture-confirmed UTI (2.8% and 3.7% style="font-family:Verdana;">; style="font-family:Verdana;"> RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.17 style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">- style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">3.27) between pregnant women with and without (G)DM were present. No association was found between ASB and UTI. GBS was the most common causative organism of ASB in women with and without DM (66.7% and 50.0%). style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: style="font-family:Verdana;"> In contrast with earlier research style="font-family:Verdana;">, style="font-family:Verdana;"> no significant differences in prevalence of ASB or incidence of UTI was found between pregnant women with and without (G)DM.
机译:> b y style =“font-family:verdana;”> ackground: style =“font-family:verdana;”>无症状的细菌(妊娠期间的ASB)和尿路感染(UTI)可能导致不良妊娠结果 y =“font-family:verdana;”>。 style =“font-womain :;” “=”“> <跨度样式=”Font-Family:Verdana;“>糖尿病(DM)和妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)被认为是妊娠期间ASB和UTI的重要额外危险因素。 < b> style =“font-family:verdana;”>目的: style =“font-family:verdana;”>调查ASB患病率的差异和UTI的发生率有没有DM和GDM的孕妇通知ASB筛选和治疗政策。 style =“font-family:verdana;”>方法: style = “Font-Family:Verdana;”>来自澳大利亚妇女和儿童医院的214名孕妇的孕妇,其中澳大利亚妇女和儿童医院,其中患有临床诊断(g)DM和对照的妇女在出生日期匹配。ASB被定义为在妊娠期间收集的第一个尿培养物中的至少10e5个菌落形成单位或群体(GBS)的任何存在的生长,而没有UTI的抱怨。临床UT我被治疗医师诊断出来,与阳性尿培养相结合,它被定义为培养证实的UTI。 <跨度样式=“font-family:verdana;”>结果: style =“font-family:verdana;”>无缺陷的普遍性没有显着差异(5.6%和3.7%;相对风险(RR)1.50; 95%置信区间(CI)0.44 style =“font-family :;”“=”> style =“font-family:verdana;”> - style =“font-family :;”“=”“> style =”font-family:verdana;“ > 5.17),临床发病率UTI(4.7%和11.2%; RR 0.42; 95%CI 0.15 - style =“font-family :;”“=”> style =“font-family:verdana;”> 1.14)或文化证实的UTI(2.8%和3.7% <跨度样式=“Font-Family:Verdana;”>; <跨度样式=“Font-Family:Verdana;”> RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.17 style =“font-family :;”“=”> style =“font-family:verdana;”> - style =“字体-Family :;“”=“> style =”font-family :;“”=“”> style =“font-family:verdana;”> 3.27)p有没有(g)dm的植物妇女。 ASB和UTI之间没有发现任何关联。 GBS是患有和没有DM的妇女中最常见的致病生物(66.7%和50.0%)。 <跨度样式=“font-family:verdana;”>结论: style =“font-family:verdana;”>与早期的研究相比, style =“font-family:verdana;”>, y style =“font-family:verdana;”>发现没有发现ASB或UTI发病率的显着差异患有和没有(g)dm的孕妇之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号