...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Rethinking Radical Surgery in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
【24h】

Rethinking Radical Surgery in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

机译:在接受Neoadjuvant化疗的晚期卵巢癌患者中间隔卵巢癌手术中的重新思考。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects on survival outcomes of the disease burden before interval debulking surgery (IDS), surgical complexity, and residual disease after IDS in advanced-stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We reviewed the data of 268 epithelial ovarian cancer patients who had received three or four cycles of NAC and undergone optimal resections through IDS. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the effects of disease burden (peritoneal cancer index (PCI)), degree of complexity of surgery (surgical complexity score/s (SCS)), and extent of residual disease. In no residual disease (R0) patients, those with intermediate/high SCS had shorter progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.001) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.001) than patients with low SCS. An analysis of a subset of patients with R0 and low PCIs showed those with intermediate/high SCS had worse PFS and OS than patients with low SCS ( p = 0.049) and OS ( p = 0.037). In multivariate analysis, patients with R0 as a result of intermediate/high SCS fared worse than patients whose R0 was achieved by low SCS (PFS hazard ratio (HR) 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.10; OS HR 5.59, 95% CI 1.70–18.39). High PCIs at the time of IDS, high SCS, and residual disease signal poor prognoses for patients treated with NAC.
机译:本研究的目的是评估在用新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗的先进期卵巢癌中的患者中疾病负担前对疾病负担的生存结果的影响。我们审查了268名上皮卵巢癌患者的数据,该癌症患者收到了三个或四个NAC周期并通过ID经历了最佳切除。 Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox回归分析用于评估疾病负担的影响(腹膜癌指数(PCI)),手术复杂程度(手术复杂性得分/ s(SCS))和残留疾病程度。在任何残留的疾病(R0)患者中,中间/高SC的患者没有更短的进展存活(PFS; P = 0.001)和总存活(OS; P = 0.001),而不是低SCS的患者。分析R0和低PCI患者的子集显示中间/高SC的患者比低SCS的患者更差(P = 0.049)和OS(P = 0.037)。在多变量分析中,R0由于中间/高SC的患者比通过低SCS实现R0(PFS危险比(HR)1.80,95%CI 1.05-3.10; OS HR 5.59,95%CI 1.70 -18.39)。 IDS,高SCS和残留疾病信号时的高PCIS患者对NAC治疗的患者的预期差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号