首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biological Methods >Comparing NGS and NanoString platforms in peripheral blood mononuclear cell transcriptome profiling for advanced heart failure biomarker development
【24h】

Comparing NGS and NanoString platforms in peripheral blood mononuclear cell transcriptome profiling for advanced heart failure biomarker development

机译:比较NGS和纳米体平台在外周血单核细胞转录组分析中的晚期心力衰竭生物标志物发育

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In preparation to create a clinical assay that predicts 1-year survival status of advanced heart failure (AdHF) patients before surgical/interventional therapies and to select the appropriate clinical assay platform for the future assay, we compared the properties of next generation sequencing (NGS) used in the gene discovery phase to the NanoString platform used in the clinical assay development phase. In 25 AdHF patients in a tertiary academic medical center from 2015 to 2016, PBMC samples were collected and aliquoted for NGS RNA whole transcriptome sequencing and compared to 770 genes represented on NanoString’s PanCancer IO 360 Gene Expression research panel. Prior to statistical analysis, NanoString and NGS expression values were log transformed. We computed Pearson correlation coefficients for each sample, comparing gene expression values between NanoString and NGS across the set of matched genes and for each of the matched genes across the set of samples. Genes were grouped by average NGS expression, and the NanoString-NGS correlation for each group was computed. Out of 770 genes from the NanoString panel, 734 overlapped between both platforms and showed high intrasample correlation. Within an individual sample, there was an expression-level dependent correlation between both platforms. The low- vs . intermediate/high-expression groups showed NGS average correlation 0.21 vs . 0.58–0.68, respectively, and NanoString average correlation 0.07–0.34 vs . 0.59–0.70, respectively. NanoString demonstrated high reproducibility ( R 2 0.99 for 100 ng input), sensitivity (probe counts between 100 and 500 detected and quantified), and robustness (similar gene signature scores across different RNA input concentrations, cartridges, and outcomes). Data from NGS and NanoString were highly correlated. These platforms play a meaningful, complementary role in the biomarker development process.
机译:在制备临床测定中,预测手术/介入治疗前的晚期心力衰竭(ADHF)患者的1年生存状态,并选择未来测定的适当临床测定平台,我们比较了下一代测序的性质(NGS )用于基因发现相到临床测定显影阶段中使用的纳米过度平台。在2015年至2016年的第三次学术医疗中心的25名ADHF患者中,收集了PBMC样品,并调味了NGS RNA全转录组测序,并与纳米术术术IO 360基因表达研究面板上表示的770个基因相比。在统计分析之前,将纳米和NGS表达值进行对数转换。我们计算了每个样品的Pearson相关系数,将纳米杆菌和NGS之间的基因表达值与整组匹配的基因进行比较,并针对每组样品的匹配基因。基因通过平均NGS表达分组,并且计算每组的纳米杆菌-NGS相关性。从770个基因从纳米模板中,在两个平台之间重叠的734并显示出高的血内相关性。在单个示例中,两个平台之间存在表达式级相关相关性。低于的。中间/高表达基团显示NGS平均相关0.21 Vs。 0.58-0.68,分别和纳米分批平均相关性0.07-0.34 vs。分别为0.59-0.70。纳米复核显示高再现性(R 2> 0.99持续100ng输入),灵敏度(探针计数在100和500之间检测到和量化),鲁棒性(不同RNA输入浓度,墨盒和结果相似的基因签名分数)。来自NGS和纳米的数据高度相关。这些平台在Biomarker开发过程中发挥了有意义的互补作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号