首页> 外文期刊>Japanese Geotechnical Journal >Depth distribution of liquefaction strength characteristics at a site damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake and predictions of liquefaction
【24h】

Depth distribution of liquefaction strength characteristics at a site damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake and predictions of liquefaction

机译:大东日本地震损坏的地方液化强度特性的深度分布及液化预测

获取原文
           

摘要

In the Great East Japan Earthquake, the reclaimed land in Tokyo bay was damaged by liquefaction. In this study, a detailed ground investigation is conducted to clarify the damage mechanism by subsidence and inclination of detached houses due to liquefaction in Irifune 4—chome, Urayasu city, which suffered major damage after the earthquake disaster. The investigation included conducting questionnaire surveys on liquefaction damage, determining the N-value by using a standard penetration test, PS logging, groundwater level measurements, and laboratory tests for undisturbed samples that were collected continuously. This study describes; 1) the depth distribution of the liquefaction strength ratio obtained from continuously collected undisturbed samples, 2) the characteristics of each depth, and 3) the energy characteristics of each specimen. The characteristics of each method were then evaluated by comparing various liquefaction predictions (i.e., effective stress, stress based method (F _(L) method), energy method). In the results of liquefaction prediction, the rise process of excess pore water pressure by the effective stress analysis was almost entirely consistent with the eyewitness testimony of the in habitants. A difference in the evaluation result between F _(L) method and energy method was noted; in the F _(L) method, the F _(L) value decreases with depth, whereas in the energy method, it tends to liquefy easily with shallower depths.
机译:在大东日本地震中,东京湾的再生土地被液化损坏。在这项研究中,进行了详细的地面调查,以澄清由于在丘亚苏市第四核心4号的IRIFUNE 4-Chome液化引起的独立房屋沉降和倾向的损害机制,在地震灾害后遭受了重大伤害。调查包括在液化损伤中进行问卷调查,通过使用标准穿透试验,PS测井,地下水位测量和实验室试验来持续收集的未受干扰样品的实验室试验。这项研究描述了; 1)从连续收集的未受干扰样品获得的液化强度比的深度分布,2)每个深度的特性,以及3)每个样本的能量特性。然后通过比较各种液化预测(即有效应力,基于应力的方法( F _(L)方法),能量方法来评估每种方法的特征。在液化预测的结果中,通过有效应力分析的过度孔隙水压力的上升过程几乎完全完全一致地与习惯剂的目击者证词一致。注意到 f _(l)方法和能量方法之间的评估结果的差异;在 f _(l)方法中, f _(l)值随深度减少,而在能量法中,它倾向于通过较浅的深度轻松液化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号