...
首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Research Protocols >Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Comparing the Impact of an Implicit Learning Approach With Standard Care on Recovery of Mobility Following Stroke: Protocol for a Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:在中风后恢复的标准小心对隐式学习方法的影响:试验群随机对照试验的协议

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Although implicit and explicit learning approaches have been well investigated in healthy populations, there is less evidence regarding the relative benefits of each approach in clinical practice. Studies in stroke typically investigate single elements of an implicit learning approach (ILA; eg, reduced quantity feedback or an external focus of attention) within controlled environments. These studies predominantly evaluate performance, with few measuring this over time (ie, learning). The relevance and transferability of current research evidence into stroke rehabilitation is therefore limited. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the ILA with standard care in the acute phase following stroke, to generate data and insights to inform the design of a definitive trial, and to understand patient and therapist perceptions of the ILA. Methods This is a multicenter, assessor-blind, cluster randomized controlled pilot trial with nested qualitative evaluation. Stroke units (clusters) will be randomized to either ILA (intervention) or standard care (control) arms. Therapy teams at the intervention sites will be trained in the ILA and provided with an intervention manual. Those at the control sites will have minimal input from the research team, other than for data collection. Consent will be provided at the individual participant level. Once enrolled, participants will receive rehabilitation that focuses on lower limb recovery, using the designated approach. Measures will be taken at baseline, every 2 weeks until the point of discharge from hospital, and at 3 months post stroke onset. Measures include the Fugl Meyer Assessment (motor leg subsection), modified Rivermead Mobility Index, Swedish Postural Adjustment in Stroke Scale, and achievement of mobility milestones. Fidelity of the treatment approach will be monitored using observational video analysis. Focus groups and interviews will be used to gain insight into the perceptions of trial participants and clinical teams. Results The first site opened to recruitment in February 2019. The opening of a further 5 sites will be staggered throughout 2019. Results are expected in early 2021. Conclusions The findings from this mixed methods pilot study will be used to inform the design of a definitive study, comparing the ILA with standard care in acute stroke rehabilitation.
机译:背景技术虽然在健康人群中良好地调查了隐含和明确的学习方法,但在临床实践中有关于各种方法的相对益处的证据较少。中风的研究通常在受控环境中调查隐式学习方法的单一要素(ILA;例如,减少量反馈或注意力的外部焦点)。这些研究主要是评估性能,几乎没有测量这一点(即学习)。因此,目前研究证据对中风康复的相关性和可转移性是有限的。目的本研究的目的是将ILA与中风后急性期的标准护理进行比较,以产生数据和见解,以告知设计明确试验,并了解患者和治疗师对ILA的看法。方法这是一个多中心,评估员,集群随机对照试验试验,嵌套定性评估。行程单元(群集)将随机随机分配给ILA(干预)或标准护理(控制)臂。干预课程的治疗团队将在ILA培训,并提供干预手册。控制站点的那些在研究团队中的输入将具有最小的输入,除了数据收集之外。同意将在个人参与者级别提供。一旦注册,参与者将获得使用指定方法的康复,专注于较低的肢体恢复。措施将在基线上,每2周才能在医院排放到排出点,并在3个月后卒中发作后3个月。措施包括Fugl Meyer评估(机动腿部级),改进的Rivermead移动性指数,瑞典语姿势调整,中风尺度,以及实现移动里程碑的实现。将使用观察视频分析监测治疗方法的保真度。焦点小组和访谈将用于深入了解审判参与者和临床团队的看法。结果2019年2月首次开放招聘现场。在2013年,将交错进一步5个网站。预计2021年的结果预计。结论这一混合方法试点研究的调查结果将被用来为明确的设计提供信息研究,将ILA与标准护理进行比较急性卒中康复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号