首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Acceptance, Usage, and Barriers of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Among German Rheumatologists: Survey Study
【24h】

Acceptance, Usage, and Barriers of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Among German Rheumatologists: Survey Study

机译:德国风湿病学家中电子患者报告的结果的接受,用法和障碍:调查研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) allows for patient-centered, measurable, and transparent care. Electronic PROs (ePROs) have many benefits and hold great potential to improve current usage of PROs, yet limited evidence exists regarding their acceptance, usage, and barriers among rheumatologists. Objective This study aims to evaluate the current level of acceptance, usage, and barriers among German rheumatologists regarding the use of ePROs. The importance of different ePRO features for rheumatologists was investigated. Additionally, the most frequently used PROs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were identified. Methods Data were collected via an online survey consisting of 18 questions. The survey was completed by members of the Working Group Young Rheumatology of the German Society for Rheumatology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie [DGRh]) at the 2019 annual DGRh conference. Only members currently working in clinical adult rheumatology were eligible to complete the survey. Results A total of 119 rheumatologists completed the survey, of which 107 (89.9%) reported collecting PROs in routine practice and 28 (25.5%) already used ePROs. Additionally, 44% (43/97) were planning to switch to ePROs in the near future. The most commonly cited reason for not switching was the unawareness of suitable software solutions. Respondents were asked to rate the features of ePROs on a scale of 0 to 100 (0=unimportant, 100=important). The most important features were automatic score calculation and display (mean 77.50) and simple data transfer to medical reports (mean 76.90). When asked about PROs in RA, the respondents listed pain, morning stiffness, and patient global assessment as the most frequently used PROs. Conclusions The potential of ePROs is widely seen and there is great interest in them. Despite this, only a minority of physicians use ePROs, and the main reason for not implementing them was cited as the unawareness of suitable software solutions. Developers, patients, and rheumatologists should work closely together to help realize the full potential of ePROs and ensure a seamless integration into clinical practice.
机译:背景技术使用患者报告的结果(优点)允许患者以患者为中心,可测量和透明的护理。电子专业人士(EPROS)有许多益处,并持有改善现有利用利用的潜力,但有限的证据存在有关其验收,用法和风湿病学障碍的障碍。目的本研究旨在评估德国风湿病学术中关于使用ePROS的当前验收,使用和障碍水平。研究了风湿病学家不同EPRO特征的重要性。此外,确定了类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者最常使用的专业效果。方法通过由18个问题组成的在线调查收集数据。该调查由德国风湿病学会的工作组年轻风湿病学成员(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie der Deutschen GesellschaftFürh])在2019年度DGRH会议上进行了德国风湿病学会(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Junge Rheumatologie [Dgrh])。只有目前在临床成人风湿病学工作的成员有资格完成调查。结果共有119名风湿病学家完成了调查,其中107名(89.9%)报告了常规实践中的收集专业权,28(25.5%)已经使用过ePROS。此外,44%(43/97)计划在不久的将来切换到EPROS。最常用的不切换原因是合适的软件解决方案的不明确。被要求受访者在0到100的范围内评估ePROS的功能(0 =不重要,100 =重要)。最重要的特征是自动评分计算和显示(平均77.50)和简单的数据传输到医疗报告(平均值76.90)。当被问及RA的专业人士时,受访者列出了痛苦,幼儿和患者全球评估,作为最常用的专业人士。结论EPROS的潜力被广泛看出,对他们有很大的兴趣。尽管如此,只有少数医生使用ePROS,而不是实施它们的主要原因被引用为合适的软件解决方案的不明确。开发人员,患者和风湿病学家应该紧密合作,帮助实现ePROS的全部潜力,并确保无缝融合到临床实践中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号