首页> 外文期刊>Drugs - Real World Outcomes >Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Medication Adherence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Oral Prostacyclins: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:用口服前列腺治疗肺动脉高血压患者的药物申请和医疗成本:回顾性队列研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundGiven the improved convenience of oral prostacyclins, there is a shift toward their use in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).ObjectivesOur objective was to compare patient characteristics, medication adherence, healthcare resource use (HCRU), and costs among patients receiving oral treprostinil or selexipag.MethodsWe used Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases to identify patients with PAH with a diagnosis code for pulmonary hypertension (PH) plus a prescription for oral treprostinil or selexipag from July 2013 to September 2017. Medication adherence, persistence, and all-cause and PAH-related HCRU and costs were compared between cohorts during the 6-month follow-up. Adjusted healthcare costs were obtained using recycled predictions and bootstrapped samples.ResultsA total of 256 (130 oral treprostinil, 126 selexipag) patients fulfilled the study criteria. The oral treprostinil cohort was more likely to be male, to have previously used parenteral prostacyclins, and to have higher outpatient costs at baseline than the selexipag cohort. During follow-up, both cohorts had similar proportions of patients who were adherent to and persistent with their respective therapies. All-cause and PAH-related medical utilization was generally similar between cohorts. The oral treprostinil cohort had 66.9% lower total PAH-related healthcare costs (mean difference ??$75,183; 95% confidence interval [CI] ??102,584 to ??49,771) and 70.6% lower PAH-related pharmacy costs (mean difference ??$76,439; 95% CI ??104,512 to ??51,458) than the selexipag cohort, with similar differences in all-cause healthcare and pharmacy costs.ConclusionsLower all-cause and PAH-related total healthcare and pharmacy costs were observed in patients receiving oral treprostinil compared with those receiving selexipag. It will be important to study longer-term costs and clinical outcomes.
机译:背景,在口服前列腺的改善方便,在治疗肺动脉高压(PAH)的情况下,可以转变.bjectivesour的目的是比较患者特征,药物依从性,医疗资源使用(HCRU),以及接受口服葡萄球菌或患者的成本Selexipag.Methodswe使用了Truven Health Marketscan商业和医疗保险数据库,以识别PAH患者,患有肺动脉高压(pH)的诊断码,加上2013年7月至2017年7月至9月的口服葡萄球菌或Selexipag。药物遵守,持久性和全部原因在6个月的随访期间,在群组中比较了与PAH相关的HCRU和成本。使用回收的预测获得调整后的医疗费用,并使用抢夺样品获得。患者总共256例(130口服Treprostinil,126个Selexipag)患者实现了研究标准。口腔葡萄球菌群体更容易成为雄性,以患有以前使用的肠胃前列腺素,并且在基线上具有比Selexipag队列更高的门诊成本。在随访期间,两个队列都有类似的比例的患者,患者依靠和持续存在于各自的疗法。群组之间的全因和PAH相关的医疗利用率通常相似。口腔茯苓蛋白队列的总PAH相关医疗费用较低66.9%(平均差异为75,183美元​​; 95%的置信区间[CI] 102,584至?? 49,771)和70.6%降低PAH相关药房成本(平均差异?? $ 76,439; 95%CI ?? 104,512至?? 51,458)比Selexipag队列,具有相似的差异存在于所有原因的医疗保健和药房费用。在接受口服葡萄球菌胰岛素的患者中观察到全局和PAH相关的总医疗保健和药房费用与接收Selexipag的人相比。研究长期成本和临床结果将是重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号