...
首页> 外文期刊>Dentistry Journal >Evaluation of Lower Dental Arch Crowding and Dimension after Treatment with Lip Bumper versus Schwarz Appliance. A Prospective Pilot Study
【24h】

Evaluation of Lower Dental Arch Crowding and Dimension after Treatment with Lip Bumper versus Schwarz Appliance. A Prospective Pilot Study

机译:利用鞋垫与施瓦茨家具治疗后牙齿拱岭挤压尺寸的评价。预期试点研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: The treatment of patients with mixed dentition, with inferior moderate dental crowding (the so-called borderline cases, between extraction and expansion) is not yet clear. Two examples of widely used appliances for increasing lower dental arch dimensions are the Schwarz’s appliance and lip bumper. The aim of this prospective study was to compare dental crowding and arch dimensions from pre- to post-treatment with lip bumper versus Schwarz’s appliance. Subjects and Methods: Pre- and post-treatment orthodontic records of twenty subjects (10 males and 10 females) were analyzed in the present study. Inclusion criteria were: first/second molar class malocclusion; crowding of the mandibular arch, from mild to moderate (4–6 mm); mixed dentition; age ≤ 9 years at the beginning of the treatment; stage CS1 or CS2 of maturation of the cervical vertebrae analysis (CVM) at the beginning of the treatment. Ten subjects were treated with a lip bumper, and ten with the removable Schwarz appliance. The primary outcomes were the variations in dental crowding and arch dimensions from pre- to post-treatment. Results: Both the two appliances caused a statistically significant mean improvement/reduction in crowding, of 3.5 mm and 2.9 mm, for the Schwarz appliance and lip bumper, respectively. The Schwarz appliance resulted more effective in increasing arch dimension at the intercanine level, and arch perimeter, while the lip bumper achieves a higher increase in arch length. Conclusions: A lip bumper and Schwarz appliance are both useful in reducing crowding in mixed dentition. This improvement is due to the increase in dental arch dimensions, although the distribution of space resulted slightly differently between the two appliances.
机译:目的:治疗混合牙列的患者,具有较差的牙齿拥挤(所谓的边缘病例,提取和扩张之间)尚不清楚。用于增加牙弓尺寸的广泛使用的电器的两个例子是Schwarz的电器和唇部保险杠。这项前瞻性研究的目的是将牙齿拥挤和拱形尺寸与唇部保险杠与Schwarz的电器进行比较。对象和方法:在本研究中分析了20个受试者(10名男性和10名女性)的治疗前和治疗后的后牙科记录。纳入标准是:第一/第二摩尔级咬合;下颌弓,从轻度到中度(4-6毫米);混合牙列;年龄≤9岁在治疗开始;在治疗开始时颈椎成熟的阶段CS1或CS2分析(CVM)。用唇部保险杠处理十个受试者,用可移除的Schwarz Appliance进行处理。主要结果是牙齿拥挤和拱形尺寸从预治疗后的变化。结果:两个设备均可分别引起统计上显着的平均改善/减少3.5毫米和2.9毫米,用于施瓦茨电器和唇部保险杠。施瓦茨家具导致在桦木水平和拱形周长上增加拱形尺寸时更有效,而唇部保险杠达到拱长增加。结论:唇部保险杠和Schwarz家具既可用于减少混合牙列的拥挤。这种改进是由于牙弓尺寸的增加,尽管两个电器之间的空间分布略有不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号