首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Emergency Surgery >Injury patterns and causes of death in 953 patients with penetrating abdominal war wounds in a civilian independent non-governmental organization hospital in Lashkargah, Afghanistan
【24h】

Injury patterns and causes of death in 953 patients with penetrating abdominal war wounds in a civilian independent non-governmental organization hospital in Lashkargah, Afghanistan

机译:953例患有953名腹部战争伤口患者死亡的损伤模式和原因,在阿富汗哈什卡拉的平民独立非政府组织医院

获取原文
           

摘要

Management of penetrating abdominal war injuries centers upon triage, echeloned care, and damage control. A civilian hospital based in a war zone can rarely rely upon these principles because it normally has limited resources and lacks rapid medical evacuation. We designed this study to describe organ injury patterns and factors related to mortality in patients with penetrating abdominal war injuries in a civilian hospital in an active war zone in Afghanistan, examine how these findings differ from those in a typical military setting, and evaluate how they might improve patients’ care. We reviewed the records of all patients admitted at the Lashkargah “Emergency” hospital with penetrating abdominal injuries treated from January 2006 to December 2016. Demographic and clinical data were recorded; univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify variables significantly associated with death. We treated 953 patients for penetrating abdominal injury. The population was mainly civilian (12.1% women and 21% under 14). Mean age was 23?years, and patients with blast injuries were younger than in the other groups. The mechanism of injury was bullet injury in 589 patients, shell injury in 246, stab wound in 97, and mine injury in 21. The most frequent abdominal lesion was small bowel injury (46.3%). Small and large bowel injuries were the most frequent in the blast groups, stomach injury in stab wounds. Overall mortality was 12.8%. Variables significantly associated with death were age??34?years, mine and bullet injury, length of stay, time since injury ?5?h, injury severity score ?17, and associated injuries. Epidemiology and patterns of injury in a civilian hospital differ from those reported in a typical military setting. Our population is mainly civilian with a significant number of women and patients under 14?years. BI are more frequent than blast injuries, and gastrointestinal injuries are more common than injuries to solid organs. In this austere setting, surgeons need to acquire a wide range of skills from multiple surgical specialties. These findings might guide trauma and general surgeons treating penetrating abdominal war wounds to achieve better care and outcome.
机译:渗透腹部战争损伤中心在分类,梯度护理和损伤控制中。基于战区的民用医院很少依靠这些原则,因为它通常具有有限的资源,并且缺乏迅速的医学疏散。我们设计了本研究,描述了在阿富汗积极的战争区的民用医院患者渗透腹部战争伤害患者的器官损伤模式和因素,研究了这些发现如何与典型的军事环境中的结果不同,并评估它们的方式可能会改善患者的护理。我们审查了在2006年1月至2016年1月治疗的腹部伤害患者患有患者的所有患者的记录。记录了人口统计学和临床​​资料;单变量和多变量分析用于识别与死亡显着相关的变量。我们治疗了953名患者渗透腹部损伤。人口主要是平民(12.1%妇女和14岁以下的21%)。平均年龄是23岁?年龄,爆炸伤害的患者比其他群体更年轻。损伤机制是589名患者的子弹损伤,246例壳体损伤,97例突然突出,21次矿损伤。最常见的腹部病变是小肠损伤(46.3%)。小而大的肠损伤是爆炸群中最常见的,刺伤胃损伤。总体死亡率为12.8%。与死亡明显相关的变量是年龄?>?34?年,矿山和子弹损伤,留下长度,自伤害以来的时间>?5?H,伤害严重程度分数>?17和相关伤害。平民医院受伤的流行病学与典型军事环境中报告的流行病学和伤害模式。我们的人口主要是平民,其中大约14岁以下的妇女和患者。比爆炸损伤更频繁,胃肠损伤比固体器官的伤害更常见。在这个奥斯特的环境中,外科医生需要从多个手术专业获取广泛的技能。这些调查结果可能指导创伤和普通外科医生治疗穿透腹部战争伤口,以实现更好的照顾和结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号