首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Healthcare Ethics During a Pandemic
【24h】

Healthcare Ethics During a Pandemic

机译:大流行期间的医疗保健伦理

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As clinicians and support personnel struggle with their responsibilities to treat during the current COVID-19 pandemic, several ethical issues have emerged. Will healthcare workers and support staff fulfill their duty to treat in the face of high risks? Will institutional and government leaders at all levels do the right things to help alleviate healthcare workers risks and fears? Will physicians be willing to make hard, resource-allocation decisions if they cannot first husband or improvise alternatives??With our healthcare facilities and governments unprepared for this inevitable disaster, front-line doctors, advanced providers, nurses, EMS, and support personnel struggle with acute shortages of equipment—both to treat patients and protect themselves. With their personal and possibly their family’s lives and health at risk, they must weigh the option of continuing to work or retreat to safety. This decision, made daily, is based on professional and personal values, how they perceive existing risks—including available protective measures, and their perception of the level and transparency of information they receive. Often, while clinicians get this information, support personnel do not, leading to absenteeism and deteriorating healthcare services. Leadership can use good risk communication (complete, widely transmitted, and transparent) to align healthcare workers’ risk perceptions with reality. They also can address the common problems healthcare workers must overcome to continue working (ie, risk mitigation techniques). Physicians, if they cannot sufficiently husband or improvise lifesaving resources, will have to face difficult triage decisions. Ideally, they will use a predetermined plan, probably based on the principles of Utilitarianism (maximizing the greatest good) and derived from professional and community input. Unfortunately, none of these plans is optimal.
机译:由于临床医生和支持人员争取他们在目前的Covid-19大流行期间对待治疗的责任,因此出现了几个道德问题。医疗保健工人和支持人员会履行责任,面对高风险吗?所有层面的机构和政府领导人会做正确的事情,以帮助缓解医疗保健工作者的风险和恐惧吗?如果他们不能先与我们的医疗保健设施和政府对这种不可避免的灾难,前线医生,先进的提供者,护士,护士,EMS和支持人员斗争,那么医生愿意努力,资源分配决策具有急性短缺的设备 - 治疗患者并保护自己。随着他们的个人和可能的家庭生活和健康的风险,他们必须权衡持续工作或退回安全的选择。每天都有本决定,基于专业和个人价值观,如何感知现有的风险 - 包括可用的保护措施,以及他们收到的信息的水平和透明度的看法。通常,虽然临床医生得到了这些信息,但支持人员没有,导致医疗保健服务恶化和恶化。领导力可以利用良好的风险通信(完整,广泛传播,透明),使医疗保健工人与现实的风险感知。他们还可以解决常见问题,医疗保健工人必须克服继续工作(即风险缓解技术)。医生,如果他们不能充分丈夫或即兴救生资源,将不得不面对困难的分类决策。理想情况下,他们将使用预定的计划,可能基于功利主义的原则(最大化最大的好处)并源自专业和社区投入。不幸的是,这些计划都不是最佳的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号