首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of CBT vs antipsychotics vs both in 14–18-year-olds: Managing Adolescent first episode Psychosis: a feasibility study (MAPS)
【24h】

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of CBT vs antipsychotics vs both in 14–18-year-olds: Managing Adolescent first episode Psychosis: a feasibility study (MAPS)

机译:CBT VS抗精神病药的随机对照试验的研究方案与14-18岁的抗精神病毒症:管理青少年第一集精神病症:可行性研究(地图)

获取原文
       

摘要

Adolescent-onset psychosis is associated with more severe symptoms and poorer outcomes than adult-onset psychosis. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend that adolescents with first episode psychosis (FEP) should be offered a combination of antipsychotic medication (APs), cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and family intervention (FI). The evidence for APs in treating psychosis is limited in adolescents compared to adults. Nevertheless, it indicates that APs can reduce overall symptoms in adolescents but may cause more severe side effects, including cardiovascular and metabolic effects, than in adults. CBT and FI can improve outcomes in adults, but there are no studies of psychological interventions (PI) in patients under 18 years old. Given this limited evidence base, NICE made a specific research recommendation for determining the clinical and cost effectiveness of APs versus PI versus both treatments for adolescent FEP. The current study aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of conducting such a trial by recruiting 14-18-year-olds with a first episode of psychosis into a feasibility prospective randomised open blinded evaluation (PROBE) design, three-arm, randomised controlled trial of APs alone versus PI alone versus a combination of both treatments. We aimed to recruit 90 participants from Early Intervention and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Teams in seven UK sites. APs were prescribed by participants' usual psychiatrists. PI comprised standardised cognitive behavioural therapy and family intervention sessions. This is the first study to compare APs to PI in an adolescent population with FEP. Recruitment finished on 31 October 2018. The study faced difficulties with recruitment across most sites due to factors including clinician and service-user treatment preferences. Current controlled trial with ISRCTN, ISRCTN80567433 . Registered on 27 February 2017.
机译:青少年发作的心理学与比成人发作精神症更严重的症状和较差的结果有关。国家临床卓越研究所(尼斯)建议将患有第一集精神病(FEP)的青少年应提供抗精神病药(APS),认知行为治疗(CBT)和家庭干预(FI)的组合。与成年人相比,治疗精神病治疗精神病的证据是有限的。然而,它表明APS可以减少青少年的整体症状,但可能导致更严重的副作用,包括心血管和代谢效应,而不是成年人。 CBT和FI可以改善成人的结果,但在18岁以下的患者中没有关于心理干预(PI)的研究。鉴于本有限的证据基础,良好的是确定APS对PI与青少年FEP的治疗的临床和成本效力的具体研究建议。目前的研究旨在通过招募14-18岁的人,通过第一集于精神病招募到可行性前瞻性随机开放的盲目评估(探针)设计,三臂,随机对照试验,了解这项试验的可行性和可接受性仅APS与PI相比,与两种治疗的组合相比。我们的目标是在七个英国地点的早期干预和儿童和青少年心理健康团队中招募90名参与者。 APS由参与者通常的精神科医生开门。 PI包括标准化的认知行为治疗和家庭干预课程。这是第一项与FEP中青少年人口中的APS对PI进行比较的研究。招聘于2018年10月31日结束。由于包括临床医生和服务 - 用户治疗偏好等因素,在大多数地点招聘中,研究面临困难。使用ISRCTN的当前对照试验,ISRCTN80567433。 2017年2月27日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号