首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy
【24h】

Comparative study of three types of lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by minimally invasive esophagectomy

机译:微创食道切除术,左复发性喉神经三种淋巴结切除术的比较研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:The objective of this study was to compare three kinds of lymphadenectomy methods along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and assess the safety and effectiveness of the new method.METHODS:A total of 194 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) at our institution from May 2013 to May 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the method of lymphadenectomy along the left RLN, the patients were divided into three groups: 75 cases underwent the conventional method (A group), 80 cases the skeletonized method (B group) and 39 cases the modified Bascule method (C group). The number of dissected lymph nodes and surgical outcomes were recorded and compared to identify differences among the three groups.RESULTS:The frequency of metastasis to the LRLN lymph node was 18.6% among all patients, and 12%, 20% and 28% in groups A, B and C, respectively. The number of harvested lymph nodes (total/chest/LRLN/LRLN+) in group B and group C were significantly greater than that of group A, but not significant between group B and group C. The hoarseness rate in group C was 15.4%, which was lower than the rate in group B (21.3%) and higher than the rate in group A (13.3%), but there was no statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS:The new method for lymphadenectomy along the left RLN during MIE in the semi-prone position is safe and reliable. It provides sufficient lymph node dissection along the left RLN.? 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是沿着复发性喉神经(RLN)进行三种淋巴结切除术方法,并评估新方法的安全性和有效性。方法:共有194例食管癌患者接受微创食道切除术( MIE在2013年5月至2017年5月的机构进行了回顾性分析。根据沿左RLN淋巴结切除术的方法,患者分为三组:75例常规方法(一组),80例骨架化方法(B组)和39例修饰的尖端法(C组) 。记录并进行了解剖淋巴结和手术结果的数量,以鉴定三组的差异。结果:所有患者的转移频率为18.6%,组中的12%,20%和28% A,B和C分别。 B组和C组中的收获淋巴结(总/胸部/ LRLN / LRLN +)的数量明显大于A组A,但B组和C组之间的显着性。C组中的声音率为15.4%,该B组(21.3%)和高于A组(13.3%)的速率低的速率低,但没有统计学意义。结论:在半的MIE期间左转RLN淋巴结切除的新方法俯卧位是安全可靠的。它提供沿左RLN提供足够的淋巴结解剖。? 2019年的作者。中国肺部肿瘤集团和约翰瓦里和儿子澳大利亚发表的胸癌

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号