首页> 外文期刊>The Annals of Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association >Outcome of Patients With Aortic Stenosis Referred to a Multidisciplinary Meeting for Transcatheter Valve
【24h】

Outcome of Patients With Aortic Stenosis Referred to a Multidisciplinary Meeting for Transcatheter Valve

机译:主动脉狭窄患者的结果提到了用于经截面瓣膜的多学科会议

获取原文
           

摘要

Statistical AnalysisResultsUntil recently, many elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and multiple risk factors were untreated due to perceived risks of surgery. With the advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation there has been a surge in referral for treatment. We present the outcome of patients referred to a multidisciplinary meeting.MethodsA total of 175 patients were reviewed between January 2008 and March 2010. Patients' characteristics, investigations, and their outcome designated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation, surgical aortic valve replacement, and medical therapy were studied. The decision making process was a combination of known risk factors accounted for in the European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation and factors unaccounted for in traditional scoring systems.ResultsSixty-three patients underwent transcatheter implantation, 74 underwent surgical valve replacement, and 38 were treated medically. There were no deaths at 30 days in the transcatheter or surgical group. There were more strokes (6.3% vs 1.4%, p = 0.057) and pacemaker implantations (25% vs 0, p = 0.0001) in the transcatheter group compared with the surgical group. The patients in the transcatheter group had shorter ventilation and intensive care stays. Similar numbers were discharged home or to their original residence. At median follow-up of 466 days, more patients had paravalvular and central aortic valve regurgitation in the transcatheter group. At one year there were more deaths in the medically managed group (30%), compared with the transcatheter (17%) or surgical groups (4%).ConclusionsSymptomatic high-risk aortic valve patients have a good outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgery. Forty-two percent of patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation had surgery and did well. The medically managed group have a poor outcome.CTSNet classification:35With the advent of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and its recent expansion [
机译:统计分析急诊训练最近,由于手术风险,许多症状主动脉狭窄和多种危险因素的许多老年患者都是未经处理的。随着经截觉管主动脉瓣植入的出现,在调节中存在潮流进行治疗。我们展示了多学科会议的患者的结果。2008年1月至2010年3月审查了175名患者的方法。患者的特征,调查及其结果指定用于经截面主动脉瓣植入,手术主动脉瓣置换和医疗治疗研究过。决策过程是在欧洲心脏手术风险评估和在传统评分系统中未计入的因素占欧洲的危险因素的组合。患者血清患者接受了经导管植入,74例接受外科瓣膜更换,38名医学治疗。经导沟管或外科手术组30天内没有死亡。与手术组相比,在经沟管组中有更多的中风(6.3%vs 1.4%,p = 0.057)和起搏器植入(25%vs 0,p = 0.0001)。经沟管组中的患者进行了更短的通风和密集护理。类似的数字被排放回家或原来的住所。在466天的中位随访中,多患者在经沟管组中具有瓣膜瓣膜和中央主动脉瓣流动。在一年内,医学管理组(30%)有更多的死亡,与经转截管(17%)或外科手术组(4%)相比。结论过敏高风险主动脉瓣患者在经沟管主动脉瓣植入后良好的结果或手术。第四十二百分之一百分之均提到的经截管主动脉瓣植入植入手术并良好。医学管理的小组具有较差的结果.CTSNET分类:35转膜管主动脉瓣植入(Tavi)的出现及其最近的扩张[

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号