首页> 外文期刊>Pravoprimenenie >Полномочия органов местного самоуправления в сфере безопасности населенных пунктов на примере выдачи разрешения на полеты: мониторинг законодательства и правоприменительной практики
【24h】

Полномочия органов местного самоуправления в сфере безопасности населенных пунктов на примере выдачи разрешения на полеты: мониторинг законодательства и правоприменительной практики

机译:当地政府机构的权力在解决航班许可证的例子的定居点领域:监督立法和执法实践

获取原文
           

摘要

The subject. The article analyzes the conflict of norms of the current legislation, the materials of law enforcement practice in terms of establishing the powers of local governments to issue permits for flights. The purpose of the paper is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that the powers of local governments to issue permits for flights are not based on the law and are established only in by-laws. The research was carried out with use of main scientific methods (analysis, induction and deduction), special (statistical) method as well as the method of interpretation of the legal acts. The main results and scope of their application. Monitoring of legislation and law enforcement shows that local governments are more likely to be an additional barrier to business activity than a body with the necessary competence to make the appropriate decision. Local self-government bodies are empowered by a secondary normative act to issue a permit for certain actions in the airspace of the Russian Federation over populated areas. It is a question of exclusively state powers which were assigned to local governments by the will of the by-law. A number of provisions of secondary legislation regulating the peculiarities of use of airspace of the Russian Federation does not have clarity and certainty. For example, it is not clear what kind of legislation should regulate skydiving (physical culture legislation or regulation of organization of flights); hot air ballooning (is it sphere of leisure activities or organization of flights). More precise legal regulation is needed for such cases. One of the purposes of imposing the functions of flight permits on local governments is to ensure the security of the population, its life, health and safety of property. But local governments have almost no own security tools. The legislation on local self-government does not contain requirements for employees of local self-government bodies related to the availability of specialized knowledge, sufficient competence to assess the degree of risk or threat. The adoption of a significant number of municipal legal acts concerning flight permits is initiated by the transport Prosecutor's office, which considers the relevant activities of local governments as a municipal service. Analysis of law enforcement practice shows its great diversity. Some courts decide that local governments have no right to regulate the issuance of flight permits. The most numerous are court decisions when the court compels local governments to adopt administrative regulations for the provision of the relevant municipal service concerning flight permits. A certain group of court cases consists of decisions taken by the court on the basis of refusal of the claim in connection with the voluntary issuance of flight permits. Conclusions. It is shown that powers of local governments to issue permits for flights are not based on the law and are contained only in by-laws. The information possessed by the local self-government bodies can be transferred to the relevant state authorities for operational decision-making in the order of interdepartmental interaction. This power has no real impact on improving the security of residents of cities and other settlements.
机译:主题。本文分析了目前立法的规范,执法实践材料的冲突,就建立地方政府的权力发行航班许可。本文的目的是确认或反驳假设,即地方政府向航班发放许可的权力不是基于法律,并仅在法律中建立。该研究是使用主要科学方法(分析,诱导和扣除),特殊(统计)方法以及法律行为的解释方法进行。他们申请的主要结果和范围。监测立法和执法表明,当地政府更有可能是对企业活动的额外障碍,而不是制定适当决定的必要能力。当地的自治机构是由次级规范行为赋予俄罗斯联邦领域空域的某些行动许可证的授权。这是一个关于律师意愿分配给地方政府的国家权力问题。次要立法规范俄罗斯联邦空域使用的特殊性的一些规定并没有明确和确定性。例如,目前尚不清楚什么样的立法应该规范跳伞(物理文化立法或航班组织的监管);热空气气球(是休闲活动的领域或航班组织)。此类案例需要更精确的法律规范。施加驾驶次数允许在地方政府上的一个目的是确保人口的安全性,其生命,健康和安全的财产。但地方政府几乎没有自己的安全工具。关于地方自治的立法不包含与专业知识的可用性有关的地方自治机构的员工的要求,以评估风险或威胁的程度。运输检察官办公室发起了一系列关于飞行许可的大量市政法律行为,该办公室旨在考虑地方政府作为市政服务的相关活动。执法实践分析表明了其多样化。有些法院认为当地政府无权规范航班许可证的发行。法院迫使地方政府采取行政法规,以便提供有关飞行许可的相关市政服务的行政法规,最多的法院决定。某一批法院案件包括法院根据拒绝与自愿发行索赔的索赔的决定组成。结论。结果表明,地方政府向航班发出许可的权力不是基于法律,并且仅在法律中载有。当地自治机构拥有的信息可以转移到有关国家当局,按照互动互动的顺序进行业务决策。这种权力对改善城市居民和其他定居点的安全性没有实际影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号