...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >Clinical Effectiveness of Interlaminar Epidural Injections of Local Anesthetic with or without Steroids for Managing Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Clinical Effectiveness of Interlaminar Epidural Injections of Local Anesthetic with or without Steroids for Managing Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:用于管理慢性颈部疼痛的类动物局部麻醉局部麻醉剂临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文

摘要

BACKGROUND:Chronic neck pain is reportedly considered the fourth leading cause of disability. Cervical interlaminar epidural injections are among the commonly administered nonsurgical interventions for managing chronic neck pain, secondary to disc herniation and radiculitis, spinal stenosis, or chronic neck pain of discogenic origin.OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the differences in the effectiveness of cervical epidural injections with local anesthetics with or without steroids for the management of chronic neck pain.STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids was performed, including a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all years up to May 2019. Meta-analysis was done for pain relief based on the Numeric Rating Scale, functional status based on the Neck Disability Index, and opioid intake dosage.RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 370 patients were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group received cervical epidural injection with steroid and local anesthetic, and the control group received injection with local anesthetic only. Regrading pain relief, no significant difference was observed between both groups (weighted mean difference [WMD], –0.006; 95% confidence interval (CI), –0.275 to 0.263; P = 0.963; I2 = 0.0% at 12 months). There was also no significant difference in the improvement of the functional status (WMD, 0.159; 95% CI, –1.231 to 1.549; P = 0.823; I2 = 9.8% at 12 months). Similarly, there was no significant difference in opioid dosage (WMD, –0.093; 95% CI, –5.952 to 5.766; P = 0.975; I2 = 0.0% at 12 months).LIMITATIONS: Only a few studies on this premise were found in the literature. There was also a lack of heterogeneity of the included RCT studies.CONCLUSIONS: The addition of steroids to anesthetic injectates was not associated with better pain and functional score outcomes compared with anesthetic injectate alone in patients with chronic neck pain.
机译:背景:据报道,慢性颈部疼痛被认为是第四个担任残疾原因。宫颈层间硬膜外注射是用于管理慢性颈部疼痛的常用的非颈部干预措施,继发于椎间盘突出症,椎间盘突变,脊柱狭窄或慢性颈部疼痛。目的:系统地审查宫颈硬膜外注射液的有效性差异局部麻醉剂或没有类固醇的慢性颈部疼痛.Study设计:系统评价和Meta分析。方法:全面搜索随机对照试验(RCT)的文献,与局部麻醉剂与类固醇进行局部麻醉剂在2019年5月至2019年5月的所有年内搜索PubMed,Embase和Cochrane数据库的搜索。基于数值评定尺度,基于颈部残疾指数的功能状态和阿片类药物剂量的功能状态进行了META分析。结果:四项研究达到了纳入标准。共有370名患者分为2组:实验组接受宫颈硬膜外注射用类固醇和局部麻醉剂,对照组仅接受局部麻醉剂注射。对疼痛缓解后,两组之间没有观察到显着差异(加权平均值[WMD],-0.006; 95%置信区间(CI),-0.275至0.263; P = 0.963; I2 = 0.0%在12个月内)。功能状态的改善也没有显着差异(WMD,0.159; 95%CI,-1.231至1.549; P = 0.823; I2 = 9.8%在12个月内)。类似地,阿片类剂量(WMD,-0.093; 95%CI,-5.952至5.766; P = 0.975; I2 = 0.0%,在12个月内,I2 = 0.0%).Limitations:只有几项关于这个前提的研究文献。还有缺乏包括的RCT研究的异质性。结论:与单独的慢性颈部疼痛患者单独使用麻醉剂注射的麻醉剂和功能评分结果没有与麻醉剂的疼痛和功能评分结果的添加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号