...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain and therapy. >The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine
【24h】

The Impact of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. Placebo on Efficacy Outcomes in Headache Day Responder and Nonresponder Patients with Chronic Migraine

机译:OnaboTulinumtoxina对安慰剂对慢性偏头痛患者的疗效结果的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

IntroductionThe phase 3 PREEMPT trials demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine. OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced headache frequency from baseline vs. placebo at 24?weeks; however, this measure may not fully capture the benefits of treatment. We evaluated the impact of onabotulinumtoxinA on patient-reported outcomes according to headache responder status.MethodsA post hoc analysis pooled 24-week data from the placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind treatment phases of the PREEMPT trials. Patients were stratified by randomized treatment (onabotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo) and headache day responder status (responder vs. nonresponder). Headache day responders had a?≥?50% headache day reduction from baseline measured at weeks 21–24. Outcomes evaluated were patient-reported reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days, Headache Impact Test, and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Missing values were estimated using a modified last-observation-carried-forward approach.ResultsIn the pooled analysis population ( N =?1384; onabotulinumtoxinA, n =?688; placebo, n =?696), headache day responder rates were 308/688 (45%) for onabotulinumtoxinA- and 238/696 (34%) for placebo-treated patients. At 24?weeks compared with baseline, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders showed significantly (all P ?0.01) greater mean (standard error) reductions vs. placebo nonresponders in moderate-to-severe headache days (–?3.5 [0.2] vs. ??2.4 [0.2]) and Headache Impact Test scores (–?2.3 [0.3] vs. –?0.8 [0.2]), and greater mean improvements in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire domains (Restrictive, 8.8 [1.0] vs. 2.9 [0.8]; Preventive, 6.0 [1.0] vs. 1.8 [0.8]; Emotional, 8.5 [1.3] vs. 2.8 [1.1]). Moderate-to-severe headache day and headache impact differences between nonresponder groups were evident at week 4 and sustained through week 24.ConclusionsRelative to placebo nonresponders, onabotulinumtoxinA nonresponders experienced significant reductions in moderate-to-severe headache days and disability and improvement in quality of life, implying that the full benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA are not captured by headache day reduction.
机译:介绍第3阶段抢先试验表明了OnaboTulinumtoxina用于慢性偏头痛的成人头痛预防的疗效和耐受性。 OnaboTulinumtoxina在24个周内显着降低了来自基线与安慰剂的头痛频率。然而,这种措施可能无法完全捕捉治疗的益处。我们评估了OnaboTulinumtoxina对患者报告的结果的影响,根据头痛响应者状态.Methodsa后Hoc分析从安慰剂控制,随机,双盲治疗阶段汇集了24周的数据。患者通过随机处理(OnaboTulinumtoxina与安慰剂)和头痛日响应者状态(响应者与非响应者)分层。头痛日响应者有一个?≥?在第21-24页的基线中减少50%的头痛日减少。评估的结果是患者报告的中度至严重的头痛天,头痛冲击试验和偏头痛特定生活质量问卷的减少。使用修改的最后观察持续的方法估计缺失值。汇集分析群体(n = 1384; Onabotulinumtoxina,n =Δ688;安慰剂,n =?696),头痛日响应率为308/688 (45%)对于安慰剂治疗患者的OnaboTulinumtoxina-and 238/696(34%)。与基线相比,与基线相比,OnaboTulinumtoxina无应答者显着(所有P <0.01)更大的平均值(标准误差)减少与安慰剂无反应者在中度至严重的头痛日( - ?3.5 [0.2] Vs.2.4 [0.2])和头痛冲击试验评分( - α2.3[0.3]与 - ?0.8 [0.2]),更大的平均改善偏头痛的寿命质量问卷结构域(限制性,8.8 [1.0]与2.9 [ 0.8];预防,6.0 [1.0]与1.8 [0.8];情绪化,8.5 [1.3]与2.8 [1.1])。在第4周,非反应器群体之间的中度至严重的头痛日和头痛影响差异,并通过第24周持续。联系安慰剂无反应者,OnaboTulinumtoxina无应答者在中度至严重的头痛日和残疾中经历了显着的减少和质量的提高生命,暗示OnaboTulinumtoxina的全部益处没有被头痛日减少捕获。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号