...
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening
【24h】

Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening

机译:丝网插入:发病率快速审查,危险因素,不良结果和筛查结果

获取原文

摘要

Velamentous cord insertion (VCI) is an umbilical cord attachment to the membranes surrounding the placenta instead of the central mass. VCI is strongly associated with vasa praevia (VP), where umbilical vessels lie in close proximity to the internal cervical os. VP leaves the vessels vulnerable to rupture, which can lead to fatal fetal exsanguination. Screening for VP using second-trimester transabdominal sonography (TAS) to detect VCI has been proposed. We conducted a rapid review investigating the quality, quantity and direction of evidence available on the epidemiology, screening test accuracy and post-screening management pathways for VCI. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 5 July 2016 and again on 11 October 2019, using general search terms for VP and VCI. Only peer-reviewed articles reporting on the epidemiology of VCI, the accuracy of the screening test and/or downstream management pathways for VCI pregnancies were included. Quality and risk of bias of each included study were assessed using pre-specified tools. Forty-one relevant publications were identified; all but one were based on non-UK pregnancy cohorts, and most included relatively few VCI cases. The estimated incidence of VCI was 0.4–11% in singleton pregnancies, with higher incidence in twin pregnancies (1.6–40%). VCI incidence was also increased among pregnancies with one or more other risk factors, including in vitro fertilisation pregnancies or nulliparity. VCI incidence among women without any known risk factors was unclear. VCI was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, most notably pre-term birth and emergency caesarean section in singleton pregnancies, and perinatal mortality in twins; however, associations varied across studies and the increased risk was typically low or moderate compared with pregnancies without VCI. In studies on limited numbers of cases, screening for VCI using TAS had good overall accuracy, driven by high specificity. No studies on post-screening management of VCI were identified. Literature on VCI epidemiology and outcomes is limited and low-quality. The accuracy of second-trimester TAS?and the benefits and harms?of screening cannot be determined without prospective studies in large cohorts. Modelling studies may indicate the feasibility and value of studying the epidemiology of VCI and the potential impact of detecting VCI as part of a population screening programme for VP.
机译:Velamento帘线插入(VCI)是围绕胎盘而不是中央质量围绕胎盘的膜的脐带附着。 VCI与VASA Praevia(VP)密切相关,其中脐部血管位于内部颈椎OS附近。 vp让易受破裂的血管叶,这可能导致致命的胎儿放血。已经提出了使用第二妊娠转机超声超声检查(TA)检测VCI的VP筛选。我们进行了快速审查,调查流行病学的质量,数量和方向,筛查试验准确性和VCI后筛选后的管理途径。 Medline,Embase和Cochrane图书馆于2016年7月5日和2019年10月11日再次搜查,使用VP和VCI的一般搜索条件。只有关于VCI流行病学的同行评审文章,包括筛查试验和/或VCI妊娠下游管理途径的准确性。使用预先指定的工具评估每个包括研究的偏差质量和风险。确定了四十一相关出版物;除了一个基于非英国怀孕队的队列,最多包括相对较少的VCI案件。 VCI的估计发病率为0.4-11%,在单身妊娠中,双胞胎妊娠的发病率较高(1.6-40%)。 VCI发病率也增加了一种或多种其他危险因素的怀孕,包括体外施肥或排除性。没有任何已知风险因素的女性的VCI发病率尚不清楚。 VCI与屈服的不良结果,最珍文的出生和急诊剖宫产,在别人怀孕和双胞胎中的围产期死亡率;然而,与没有VCI的妊娠相比,在研究中变化的关联和风险增加通常是低或中度的。在有限数量病例的研究中,通过高特异性驱动,使用TAS筛选VCI具有良好的整体精度。没有确定关于VCI后筛查管理的研究。 VCI流行病学和结果的文献是有限和低质量的。第二个三个月Tas的准确性以及筛选的益处和危害无法在大群组中没有前瞻性研究,没有确定。建模研究可能表明,研究VCI流行病学的可行性和价值以及检测VCI的潜在影响,作为VP人口筛查计划的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号