...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Septic shock: ECMO beyond ARDS? Introducing the Simon two-stage protocol when randomisation is considered unethical
【24h】

Septic shock: ECMO beyond ARDS? Introducing the Simon two-stage protocol when randomisation is considered unethical

机译:化粪池休克:Ecmo超越Ards?当随机化被认为是不道德的时,介绍Simon两级协议

获取原文

摘要

One of the great disappointments during the past decades has been the failure to convert advances in our understanding of the biologic features of sepsis into new therapies. Although numerous multicenter, randomized controlled trials have been conducted in the last 30 years, no reduction of septic shock mortality was achieved [1] [2]. [3] Taking together available evidence suggests that no sepsis specific therapies are available until today, although a roadmap on the way to a specific septic shock therapy might be on the horizon [3] [4] including artificial intelligence.
机译:过去几十年来的一个巨大的失望是未能转化我们对脓毒症生物学特征的进步成为新疗法。虽然在过去30年中进行了许多多中心,随机对照试验,但达到了脓毒性休克死亡率的减少[1] [2]。 [3]携带可用证据表明,直到今天,没有败血症特定疗法,虽然途径对特定化脓性休克治疗的路线图可能在地平线[3] [4],包括人工智能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号