首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >A Novel Scoring Instrument to Assess Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Patellar Tendon Autograft at 2-Year Follow-up Using Contemporary Graft-Harvesting Techniques
【24h】

A Novel Scoring Instrument to Assess Donor Site Morbidity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Patellar Tendon Autograft at 2-Year Follow-up Using Contemporary Graft-Harvesting Techniques

机译:一种新型评分仪器,用于评估前十字韧带重建与髌骨腱自体移植术后2年后的韧带韧带重建,采用当代移植工艺技术

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft is clinically significant, but evidence with contemporary techniques is lacking. Purpose: To (1) evaluate donor site morbidity at a single institution using modern techniques of BTB autograft harvest at 2-year follow-up, (2) develop a 10-question donor site morbidity instrument, and (3) compare this instrument against traditional outcome tools. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We analyzed the 2-year follow-up outcomes of 200 consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. The surgical technique utilized modern and consistent BTB autograft harvest, including graft sizing, patellar tendon and peritenon closure, and patellar and tibial donor site bone grafting. There were 187 patients included, with 13 patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction excluded. An original 10-question scoring instrument evaluating donor site morbidity was administered to each patient (score, 0-100) and compared against each patient’s International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. Results: Overall, 13.9% of patients were noted to have anterior knee pain with activity at 2-year follow-up. Moreover, 3.7% of patients reported an inability to kneel on hard surfaces but had no problems on soft surfaces; 5.9% of patients reported mild discomfort but were able to kneel on all surfaces. Additionally, 75.4% of patients had a perfect (100/100) donor site morbidity score. The mean donor site morbidity score at 2-year follow-up was 98.3 ± 3.4. There was a very strong correlation between the IKDC and Lysholm scores but only a strong and moderate correlation when the donor site morbidity score was compared with the IKDC and Lysholm scores, respectively. Conclusion: Donor site morbidity after ACL reconstruction with a BTB autograft was less frequent than reported in the existing literature. Some patients developed anterior knee pain; therefore, an informed discussion is advised. IKDC and Lysholm scores may not capture donor site symptoms after surgery. The 10-question donor site morbidity instrument may provide a more accurate assessment.
机译:背景技术:前十字韧带(ACL)重建与骨头髌骨 - 骨骼(BTB)自体移植的供体部位发病率在临床上显着,但缺乏现代技术的证据。目的:至(1)使用2年后续的BTB自体移植收获的现代技术评估捐助部位发病率,(2)开发一个10质询捐助网站发病仪,(3)将这种乐器与传统成果工具。研究设计:案例系列;证据级别,4.方法:我们分析了200年连续的200名连续患者的后续结果,并在单个机构的2个外科医生执行的BTB自体移植患者进行了ACL重建。外科技术利用现代和一致的BTB自体集收获,包括移植尺寸,髌腱和腹膜封闭,以及髌骨和胫骨供体部位骨移植。包括187名患者,其中13名患者接受修改ACL重建。评估供体部位发病率的原始10次评分仪器对每位患者(得分,0-100)并与每个患者的国际膝关节文件(IKDC)和Lysholm分数进行比较。结果:总体而言,13.9%的患者被指出,在2年随访时患有前膝疼痛。此外,3.7%的患者报告无法在硬表面上跪下,但在软表面上没有问题; 5.9%的患者报告了轻度不适,但能够在所有表面上跪下。此外,75.4%的患者具有完美(100/100)捐助部位的发病率分数。 2年后续的平均供体现场的发病率分数为98.3±3.4。 IKDC和Lysholm评分之间存在非常强烈的相关性,但只有在与IKDC和Lysholm评分进行比较时,只有当捐助部位发病率分数时的强烈和中等的相关性。结论:在现有文献中,BTB自体移植的ACL重建后的供体部位发病率较少。有些患者发育了前膝疼痛;因此,建议明智的讨论。 IKDC和Lysholm评分在手术后可能无法捕获供体部位症状。 10题捐赠部位发病率仪器可能提供更准确的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号