首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >The Effect of Grassland Management History on Soil Carbon Response to Slurry and Urea
【24h】

The Effect of Grassland Management History on Soil Carbon Response to Slurry and Urea

机译:草地管理史对泥浆和尿素土壤碳应对的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Slurry and urea applications are part of normal nutrient management on grassland farms utilizing grazed grass and silage for animal production. It was hypothesized that management history would result in a different carbon response to slurry and urea applications for the same soil type because of differences in soil micro-environment, including microbial biomass and activity, are formed and regulated by long-term management history. An Irish grassland soil of the Skeagh Series was sampled in three fields, each with a long, consistent management history: Soil A was associated with extensive grazing by horses; soil B with medium intensity grazing by sheep and cattle, and grass silage conservation; and soil C with intensive dairy cow grazing. There were three slurry treatments (S 1) , the control of no slurry; S 2) , slurry mixed with soil; S 3) , slurry added o n the soil surface) and three urea treatments (N 1) , the control of no urea; N 2,) all urea applied at one time; and N 3) , three application, 30 days apart, totaling the same amount of urea as N 2) ) designed to supply 36 g C m ﹣2) and 2 g N m ﹣2) during an 85 day incubation trial. Soil pH, total carbon, cold water extractable organic carbon, soil respiration and two C-related enzymes ( β -glucosidase and CM-cellulase) were measured. All measured soil properties showed a significant difference ( P < 0.05) by management history, indicating a strong influence of long-term management on response. β -glucosidase and CM-cellulase activity showed a strong relationship with soil management history rather than with slurry or urea additions. It was concluded that management history was important to C dynamics. Slurry mixed with soil resulted in a greater soil carbon loss than slurry applied on the soil surface. One large dose of urea caused greater soil carbon loss than multiple small doses.
机译:浆料和尿素应用是利用所吃草和青贮饲养动物生产的草地农场正常营养管理的一部分。假设管理历史将导致对相同土壤型浆料和尿素应用的不同碳反应,因为在长期管理历史中形成和调节土壤微环境的差异,包括微生物生物环境,包括微生物生物环境。 Skeagh系列的爱尔兰草原土壤被取样三个领域,每个领域都有一个漫长而持续的管理历史:土壤A与马匹的广泛放牧有关;土壤B绵羊和牛的中等强度放牧,草青贮饲养;和土壤c与强化奶牛放牧。有三种浆料治疗(S 1),对没有浆料的控制; S 2),浆料与土壤混合; S 3),浆料加入土壤表面的液面)和三种尿素治疗(N 1),无尿素的控制; n 2,)尿素一次施用; N 3),三种应用,分开30天,总量的尿素量为N 2))在85天孵育试验期间设计为提供36g C m -2)和2g n m -2)。测量土壤pH,总碳,冷水可提取的有机碳,土壤呼吸和两个相关酶(β-葡糖苷酶和CM-纤维素酶)。所有测量的土壤性质显示出巨大差异(P <0.05),通过管理历史,表明长期管理对应对的强烈影响。 β-葡糖苷酶和CM纤维素酶活性与土壤管理历史而不是浆料或尿素添加表现出强烈的关系。它的结论是,管理历史对C动态很重要。与土壤混合的浆料导致土壤碳损失大于在土壤表面上施加的浆料。一种大剂量的尿素引起了比多个小剂量更大的土壤碳损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号