首页> 外文期刊>Obstetrics and Gynecology International >Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia
【24h】

Use of Cesarean Birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4 at Mizan-Tepi University Hospital, Ethiopia

机译:在埃塞俄比亚中米宁 - 特里大学医院中罗森集团2和4中使用剖腹产

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. Primary cesarean birth rates were high among women who were either nulliparous (Group 2) or multiparous (Group 4) with a single, cephalic, term fetus who were induced, augmented, or underwent cesarean birth before labor in our study cohort. Objectives. The objective of this analysis was to determine what risk factors were associated with cesarean birth among Robson Groups 2 and 4. Methods. This study was a prospective hospital-based cross-sectional analysis of a convenience sample of 1,000 women who delivered at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital in the summer and fall of 2019. Results. Women in Robson Groups 2 and 4 comprised 11.4% (n?=?113) of the total population (n?=?993). The cesarean birth rate in Robson Group 2 (n?=?56) was 37.5% and in Robson Group 4 (n?=?57) was 24.6%. In Robson Group 2, of all prelabor cesareans (n?=?5), one birth was elective cesarean by maternal request; the intrapartum cesarean births (n?=?16) mostly had a maternal or fetal indication (93.8%), with one birth (6.2%) indicated by “failed induction or augmentation,” which was a combined indication. In Robson Group 4, all 4 women delivered by prelabor cesarean had a maternal indication (one was missing data), and 3 of the intrapartum cesareans were indicated by “failed induction or augmentation.” In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 2, having a labor duration of “not applicable” increased the risk of cesarean delivery (RR 2.9, CI (1.5, 5.4)). The odds of requiring maternal antibiotics was the only notable outcome with increased risk (RR 11.1, CI (1.9, 64.9)). In multivariable modeling of Robson Group 4, having a labor longer than 24 hours trended towards a significant association with cesarean (RR 3.6, CI (0.9, 14.3)), and women had a more dilated cervix on admission trended toward having a lower odds of cesarean (RR 0.8, CI (0.6, 1.0)). Conclusion. Though rates of primary cesarean birth among women who have a term, single, cephalic fetus and are induced, augmented, or undergone prelabor cesarean birth are high, those that occur intrapartum seem to be associated with appropriate risk factors and indications, though we cannot say this definitely as we did not perform an audit. More research is needed on the prelabor subgroup as a separate entity.
机译:背景。初级剖宫产率在患有单一的脑梗死的患者(第2组)或多环(第4组)中的女性中患者患者高,在我们的研究队列之前诱导,增强或接受剖腹产的胎儿。目标。该分析的目的是确定罗布森组2和4中的剖宫产有什么风险因素。方法。本研究是一家基于前瞻性医院的横断面分析,对夏季和2019年秋季在Mizan-Tepi大学教学医院交付的1,000名妇女的便利样本。结果。罗布森群体2和4的妇女组成总人口的11.4%(n?=?113)(n?= 993)。罗布森第2组(N?=?56)中的剖宫产率为37.5%,在罗伯森组4中(N?=?57)为24.6%。在罗布森第2组中,所有前列福赛(N?=?5),一次出生是由产妇要求选修的剖宫产;癌癌酸癌(N?=?16)主要具有母体或胎儿指示(93.8%),其中一个出生(6.2%)表示,“失败的诱导或增强”表示,这是一个组合的迹象。在罗布森第4组中,所有4名由前剖腹产的女性都有母体指示(一个是缺失数据),其中3个内因剖宫产是指“失败的寄养或增强”。在罗布森组2的多变量建模中,劳动持续时间“不适用”增加了剖宫产的风险(RR 2.9,CI(1.5,5.4))。需要母体抗生素的几率是风险增加的唯一值得注意的结果(RR 11.1,CI(1.9,64.9))。在罗伯逊组4的多变量建模中,劳动力超过24小时趋向于与剖腹产的重要关联(RR 3.6,CI(0.9,14.3)),妇女在入学趋势趋于较低的次数剖腹产(RR 0.8,CI(0.6,1.0))。结论。虽然患有术语,单身胎儿和诱导,增强或经过前期剖腹产的女性的原发性剖宫产率很高,但虽然我们不能说,那些发生的内部似乎与适当的风险因素和适应症有关这绝对是我们没有执行审计。在Prelabor子组中需要更多的研究作为单独的实体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号