...
首页> 外文期刊>Review of Economic Perspectives >Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods
【24h】

Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods

机译:通过专家方法确定重大政策挑战和政策干预措施

获取原文
           

摘要

This paper presents the application of expert decision methods for the formulation and prioritization of the long-term economic, social and environmental policies in the Slovak Republic. The Partnership Agreement for the Slovak Republic (PA) is an underlying strategy for investments from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) in the period 2021-2027. Policies implemented under the PA will allocate €13.4b on four policy objectives. This paper concentrates on the policy objective 4 ‘Social development’. The authors co-operated with the Deputy Prime Minister Office and assembled panels of top Slovak experts on social and economic issues. The Delphi and Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods were combined for analyzing major development challenges and eliciting policy priorities. The methods combined the bottom-up and top-down approaches to policy making. Nine potential policy measures in three policy areas emerged from the Delphi exercise. The AHP exercise applied three criteria (relevance, urgency and feasibility) to rank the abovementioned measures within three policy areas. As for the Policy Area 1 (Labour market, employment, training and institutions) the measure 4.1.1 ‘Improving access to employment and modernizing institutions and services on labour market’ clearly dominated over the measure 4.1.2 ‘Supporting a better work-life balance’. The measure 4.2.2 ‘Equal access to quality and inclusive education’ emerged substantially more important than measures 4.2.1 ‘Improving the quality and effectiveness of education and training systems’ and 4.2.3 ‘Support to life-long learning’ in the Policy Area 2 ‘Education and skills’. Finally, measures 4.3.2 ‘Supporting social and economic integration of marginalized Roma communities’ and 4.3.3 ‘Ensuring equal access to healthcare including primary care’ received the highest ranks in the Policy Area 3 ‘Health and social services’.
机译:本文介绍了专家决策方法在斯洛伐克共和国长期经济,社会和环境政策的制定和优先次序的应用。斯洛伐克共和国(PA)的伙伴关系协议是在2021 - 2012年期间欧洲结构和投资基金(ESIF)投资的潜在战略。根据PA实施的政策将在四项政策目标上分配13.4B欧元。本文专注于政策目标4“社会发展”。作者与副总理办公室合作,并在斯洛伐克专家副总理办公室和组装了社会和经济问题的专家面板。德尔福和分析层次过程(AHP)方法组合用于分析重大发展挑战和引出政策优先事项。该方法将自下而上和自上而下的策略制作方法组合。从Delphi练习中出现的三个政策领域的九个潜在政策措施。 AHP练习应用了三个标准(相关性,紧迫性和可行性),以在三个政策领域进行上述措施。至于政策领域1(劳动力市场,就业,培训和机构)的措施4.1.1“改善了对劳动力市场的就业和现代化机构和服务”明确主导了4.1.2'支持更好的工作 - 生活平衡'。措施4.2.2'平等获取质量和包容性教育'出现了比4.2.1'提高教育和培训系统的质量和有效性,4.2.3'在政策中的终身学习的支持面积2'教育和技能'。最后,措施4.3.2“支持边缘化罗马社区的社会和经济一体化”和4.3.3“确保平等获取医疗保健,包括初级保健”在3“健康和社会服务”政策领域的最高级别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号