首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology >Effectiveness and safety of follitropin alfa (Ovaleap?) for ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol in real-world clinical practice: a multicenter, prospective, open, non-interventional assisted reproductive technology study
【24h】

Effectiveness and safety of follitropin alfa (Ovaleap?) for ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol in real-world clinical practice: a multicenter, prospective, open, non-interventional assisted reproductive technology study

机译:Follitropin Alfa(ovalap?)用于卵巢刺激的卵巢刺激在现实世界临床实践中的卵巢刺激:多中心,前瞻性,开放,非介入辅助生殖技术研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The use of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) in ovarian stimulation protocols for infertility treatment in assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinical practice is well established. More recent advancements include the availability of biosimilar r-hFSH products, which expand the choices available to healthcare practitioners and patients. Better understanding of how such a product contributes to routine clinical practice is valuable to help prescribers make informed treatment choices. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of ovarian stimulation (OS) with follitropin alfa (Ovaleap?) for routine IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cycles in real-world ART clinical practice. This non-interventional, multicenter, prospective study was initiated in 34 specialized reproductive medicine centers in Germany. Eligible women were 18–40?years old with a body mass index ?30?kg/m2, menstrual cycle 24–35?days and anti-Müllerian hormone ≥1?ng/mL, who were undergoing a first OS cycle exclusively with Ovaleap? during routine ART using a GnRH antagonist protocol. Primary effectiveness outcomes were number of retrieved oocytes after OS and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of transferred embryos, live birth delivery rate, safety, and user satisfaction with the Ovaleap? pen. Of 507 women screened, 463 received at least 1 dose of Ovaleap? and 439 had Visit 2 data (per protocol population; PPP). The mean(±SD) number of retrieved oocytes was 11.8?±?7.2 (PPP). The CPR among women with documented embryo transfer was 41.3% (158/383), resulting in a live birth delivery rate of 31.6% (138/437) among PPP patients with available follow-up information. Overall, 8.6% (40/463) of women reported ≥1 adverse drug reaction. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 23 (5.0%) patients, rated mild in 14 (3.0%), moderate in 8 (1.7%), and severe in 1 (0.2%). Patients reported high user satisfaction and high convenience with use of the Ovaleap? pen. The effectiveness and safety of OS with Ovaleap? in a GnRH antagonist protocol were extended to real-world ART clinical practice for the first time. Registered on 22 June 2016 (retrospectively registered) at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02809989).
机译:在辅助生殖技术(ART)临床实践中,在卵巢刺激方案中使用重组人卵泡刺激激素(R-HFSH)在辅助生殖技术(ART)临床实践中的临床实践。最近的进步包括生物拖不机型R-HFSH产品的可用性,这扩大了医疗保健从业者和患者可用的选择。更好地了解这样的产品如何促进常规临床实践是有价值的,帮助公务员提供知情的治疗选择。本研究的目的是研究卵巢刺激(OS)与Follitropin Alfa(Ovalap?)的有效性和安全性,用于常规IVF或Intrytoplasmic精子注射治疗,在促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂循环中的术语术语临床实践。这种非介入,多中心的前瞻性研究是在德国的34个专门的生殖医学中心启动的。符合条件的女性是18-40岁?岁月,身体质量指数<?30?kg / m2,月经周期24-35?天和抗Müllerian激素≥1?ng / ml,他们专门接受了第一个OS周期ovaleap?在常规艺术期间使用GNRH拮抗剂方案。初级有效性结果是OS和临床妊娠率(CPR)后检索的卵母细胞的数量。二次结果包括施肥率,转移胚胎数,活产率,安全和用户满意度与ovaleap?钢笔。在507名女性筛选中,463次接受至少1剂ovaleap? 439访问了2个数据(每协议人口; PPP)。检索卵母细胞的平均值(±Sd)的数量为11.8?±7.2(PPP)。胚胎转移的妇女的CPR为41.3%(158/383),导致PPP患者中的31.6%(138/437)的活产率为31.6%(138/437)。总体而言,8.6%(40/463)妇女报告≥1不良药物反应。卵巢过度刺激综合征发生在23例(5.0%)患者中,额定温和14(3.0%),中等为8(1.7%),1(0.2%)。患者报告了高用户满意度和高ovaleap的便利?钢笔。 OVALEAP的操作系统的有效性和安全性?在GNRH拮抗剂方案首次扩展到现实世界艺术临床实践。在2016年6月22日(回顾性地注册)在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02809989)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号