首页> 外文期刊>Research Journal of Finance and Accounting >Firms’ Financial Reporting Transparency and the Rank of Financial Reporting Transparency
【24h】

Firms’ Financial Reporting Transparency and the Rank of Financial Reporting Transparency

机译:公司财务报告透明度和财务报告透明度的级别

获取原文
           

摘要

Financial crisis in global stock exchange especially September incident in 1997 and following Enron’s financial disgrace and some European and American corporations at 2000 were caused that professional communities pay attention to information transparency issue in financial reporting process. Foreclosing public confidence from capital markets allows above countries to codify and amend rules that guarantee investors’ confidence to commercial cycles and presented information by them. Sanction regulations such as Cadbury’s reports (1992); Greenbury (1998) and Hampel (1998) in England, publication of Vinute’s report (1996-1998) in France and financial security principle (2003); SOX in US (2002); KonTraG (1998); Berlinz (2000) and KapAEG (2005) in Germany show a new wave from attention to modifying strategic system frameworks that existed along increasing shareholders’ right in stock exchange and enhancing external information quality (Estiger and Volf Gang 2008).
机译:全球证券交易所的金融危机特别是1997年的9月事件,并在2000年的欧洲金融耻辱和一些欧洲和美国公司之后造成了专业社区关注财务报告过程中的信息透明度问题。从资本市场中取消公众信任允许各国编纂和修改保证投资者对商业周期信任并由他们提出的信息的规则。吉百利报告(1992年)等制裁法规;格林伯里(1998)和汉普尔(1998年)在英国,在法国和金融安全原则(2003年)的Vinute的报告(1996-1998)出版; SOX在美国(2002); kontrag(1998); Berlinz(2000)和Kapaeg(2005)在德国展示了一种新的浪潮,从关注沿着股东在证券交易所的增加和加强外部信息质量(Estiger和Volf 2008)中的持续持续的战略制度框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号