首页> 外文期刊>npj Digital Medicine >Do you understand the words that are comin outta my mouth? Voice assistant comprehension of medication names
【24h】

Do you understand the words that are comin outta my mouth? Voice assistant comprehension of medication names

机译:你明白彗星嘴巴的话吗?语音辅助药物的助理名称

获取原文
       

摘要

This study investigated the speech recognition abilities of popular voice assistants when being verbally asked about commonly dispensed medications by a variety of participants. Voice recordings of 46 participants (12 of which had a foreign accent in English) were played back to Amazon’s Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple’s Siri for the brand- and generic names of the top 50 most dispensed medications in the United States. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated that Google Assistant achieved the highest comprehension accuracy for both brand medication names (M = 91.8%, SD = 4.2) and generic medication names (M = 84.3%, SD = 11.2), followed by Siri (brand names M = 58.5%, SD = 11.2; generic names M = 51.2%, SD = 16.0), and the lowest accuracy by Alexa (brand names M = 54.6%, SD = 10.8; generic names M = 45.5%, SD = 15.4). An interaction between voice assistant and participant accent was also found, demonstrating lower comprehension performance overall for those with a foreign accent using Siri (M = 48.8%, SD = 11.8) and Alexa (M = 41.7%, SD = 12.7), compared to participants without a foreign accent (Siri M = 57.0%, SD = 11.7; Alexa M = 53.0%, SD = 10.9). No significant difference between participant accents were found for Google Assistant. These findings show a substantial performance lead for Google Assistant compared to its voice assistant competitors when comprehending medication names, but there is still room for improvement.
机译:本研究调查了流行语音助理的语音识别能力,当口头被各种参与者常用的常用药物询问时。 46名参与者(其中12名以英语)的声音录音录制回亚马逊的Alexa,Google Assistant和Apple的Siri为美国前50个最具分配的药物的品牌和通用名称进行了播放。反复措施Anova表明,Google助理为品牌药物名称(M = 91.8%,SD = 4.2)和通用药物名称(M = 84.3%,SD = 11.2)达到了最高的理解准确性,其次是SIRI(品牌名称M = 58.5%,SD = 11.2;通用名称M = 51.2%,SD = 16.0),以及Alexa的最低精度(品牌名称M = 54.6%,SD = 10.8;通用名称M = 45.5%,SD = 15.4)。还发现了语音助理和参与者重音之间的互动,与使用SIRI(M = 48.8%,SD = 11.8)和ALEXA(M = 41.7%,SD = 12.7)的外来口音的人展示了较低的理解性能。(M = 41.7%,SD = 12.7)。没有外国口音的参与者(Siri M = 57.0%,SD = 11.7; Alexa M = 53.0%,SD = 10.9)。找到了Google Assistant的参与者口音之间没有显着差异。这些调查结果显示了与其语音助理竞争对手相比,谷歌助理在理解药物名称时,谷歌助手的大量表现提供,但仍有改进余地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号