首页> 外文期刊>Natural Gas Industry B >Applicable conditions of the binomial pressure method and pressure-squared method for gas well deliverability evaluation
【24h】

Applicable conditions of the binomial pressure method and pressure-squared method for gas well deliverability evaluation

机译:二项式压力法和压力平方法的适用条件,用于气井可递送性评价

获取原文
           

摘要

In order to quickly and accurately evaluate gas well deliverability, it is necessary to clarify the applicable conditions of the simplified laminar-inertial-turbulent gas well deliverability evaluation method (i.e., pressure-squared method and pressure method). In this regard, this paper analyzes the PVT data, simulation wells and field case wells of typical gas reservoirs in China by reviewing the formal evolution of the flow control equation for the real gases in porous media. Then, the applicable conditions of binomial pressure-squared method and pressure method are discussed. And the following research results were obtained. First, when the pressure is lower than 14?MPa,μZis basically a constant; and when the pressure is higher than 42?MPa,ρμZis basically a constant. Second, the applicable range of the pressure-squared method can be increased from 14 to 20?MPa. In this case, the relative error of absolute open flow potential calculated using the pressure-squared method is less than 5% compared with the pseudo-pressure method. If the pressure is between 20 and 30?MPa, the relative error of the absolute open flow potential calculated using the pressure-squared method is less than 10%. Third, when the pressure exceeds 80?MPa, the relative error of the absolute open flow potential calculated using the pressure method is less than 10% compared with the pseudo-pressure method. If the pressure-squared method is used in the case of high pressure, the calculated absolute open flow potential is lower and the relative error is close to 25%. Fourth, in the case of low pressure, if the pressure is constant, the higher the temperature is, the smaller the relative error between the pressure-squared method and the pseudo-pressure method is. In the case of high pressure, if the pressure is constant, the higher the temperature is, the greater the relative error between the pressure method and the pseudo-pressure method. In conclusion, it is recommended to adopt the pseudo-pressure method in laminar–inertial-turbulent gas well deliverability analysis. In the case of low pressure (below 30?MPa), the pressure-squared method can be used. In the case of high pressure (above 80?MPa), the pressure method can be applied.
机译:为了快速准确地评估气体良好的可递送性,有必要阐明简化的层内湍流气体井可传递能评价方法的适用条件(即压力平方法和压力方法)。在这方面,本文通过审查多孔介质中真实气体的流量控制方程的正式演变来分析中国的PVT数据,仿真孔和现场案例井。然后,讨论了二项式压力平方法和压力法的适用条件。并获得以下研究结果。首先,当压力低于14Ω·mpa时,μzis基本上是恒定的;当压力高于42℃时,ρμzis基本上是恒定的。其次,压力平方法的适用范围可以从14到20增加到20℃。在这种情况下,与伪压力法相比,使用压力平方法计算的绝对开放流动电位的相对误差小于5%。如果压力在20和30?MPa之间,则使用压力平方法计算的绝对开放流电位的相对误差小于10%。第三,当压力超过80℃时,与伪压力法相比,使用压力法计算的绝对开放流动电位的相对误差小于10%。如果在高压的情况下使用压力平方法,则计算的绝对开放流电位较低,相对误差接近25%。第四,在低压的情况下,如果压力是恒定的,温度越高,压力平方法之间的相对误差越大,伪压力方法越小。在高压的情况下,如果压力是恒定的,则温度越高,压力方法与伪压力的相对误差越大。总之,建议采用层内湍流气体井交付性分析中的伪压力法。在低压(低于30≤MPa)的情况下,可以使用压力平方法。在高压(高于80ΩMPa)的情况下,可以应用压力方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号