...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Acupuncture therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in abdominal operation: A Bayesian network meta analysis
【24h】

Acupuncture therapy on postoperative nausea and vomiting in abdominal operation: A Bayesian network meta analysis

机译:针灸治疗术后恶心和腹部运行呕吐:贝叶斯网络元分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication after surgery. However, drugs cannot prevent it completely, and acupuncture therapy shows the potential in preventing PONV, yet the best choice hasn’t been demonstrated. Objective: This network meta analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different acupuncture therapies used for preventing PONV in abdominal operation. Methods: Authors searched articles from PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Ebsco and Ovid/Embase, and established database from setup time to June 2019. Quality evaluation of included studies was performed with Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2.0). Pairwise and network meta analysis were conducted by RevMan and Addis respectively. Results: Twenty studies with 2862 patients were included in this research. Pairwise meta analysis shows that compared with placebo, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation had lower risk of postoperative nausea (PON) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, 95%confidence interval (CI): 0.30–0.60), postoperative vomiting (POV) (OR = 0.53, 95%CI: 0.36–0.78), PONVs (OR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.31–0.68), and postoperative rescue (POR) (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.41–0.90), Capsicum had lower risk of PON (OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.09–0.28), PONVs (OR = 0.23, 95%CI: 0.12–0.45), Acupressure had lower risk of POV (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.25–0.70), POR (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.27–0.64). In network meta analysis , compared with usual care, the probability rank suggested that Acupoint Injection showed lowest risk of PON (OR = 0.02, 95%CI: 0.00–0.11), POV (OR = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.01–0.49), Usual care for PONVs (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.13–0.75), and Capsicum for POR (OR = 0.39, 95%CI: 0.07–2.33). Further study should be carried out to verify this result. Conclusion: Both pairwise and network meta analysis showed acupuncture therapy was superior to placebo and usual care. Different acupuncture therapy regimens may have advantages in different aspects. And compared with POV, PON seems easier to control. Research results may provide guidance for the prevention of PONV. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42019147556.
机译:背景:术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)是手术后的常见并发症。然而,药物不能完全防止它,并且针灸治疗表明预防PONV的潜力,但尚未证明最佳选择。目的:该网络荟萃分析旨在评估不同针灸治疗用于预防腹部手术中PONV的疗效。方法:作者搜索了来自PubMed / Medline,Cochrane图书馆,科学网站,EBSCO和Ovid / Embase的文章,以及从设置时间到2019年6月建立的数据库。包含的Cochrane偏倚工具(Rob)进行了综合研究的质量评估2.0)。成对和网络元分析分别由Revman和Addis进行。结果:二十二十项研究涉及2862名患者的研究。成对元分析表明,与安慰剂相比,经皮电神经刺激的术后恶心风险较低(PON)(OTS比率(或)= 0.42,95%置信区间(CI):0.30-0.60),术后呕吐(POV)(辣椒的(或= 0.46,95%CI:0.31-0.68),辣椒,= 0.53,95%CI:0.36-0.78),PONV(OR = 0.46,95%CI:0.31-0.68),胶囊PON的风险降低(或= 0.16,95%CI:0.09-0.28),PONV(或= 0.23,95%CI:0.12-0.45),POV的风险较低(或= 0.42,95%CI:0.25- 0.70),POR(或= 0.42,95%CI:0.27-0.64)。在网络元分析中,与通常的护理相比,概率等级表明,穴位注射显示出占PON的最低风险(或= 0.02,95%CI:0.00-0.11),POV(或= 0.06,95%CI:0.01-0.49) ,通常护理PONV(或= 0.31,95%CI:0.13-0.75),以及POR的辣椒(OR = 0.39,95%CI:0.07-2.33)。应进行进一步的研究以验证此结果。结论:两者和网络元分析都显示针灸治疗优于安慰剂和普通护理。不同的针灸治疗方案可能具有不同方面的优点。与POV相比,PON似乎更易于控制。研究结果可以为预防庞夫提供指导。系统审查注册:Prospero CRD42019147556。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号