首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of myelopathy due to two-level localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
【24h】

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of myelopathy due to two-level localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

机译:前宫颈椎间盘切除术和融合对后层夹成形术导致肌钙化因后纵韧带的两级局部骨化

获取原文
           

摘要

We conducted a retrospective study to compare the clinical and radiological results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior laminoplasty for two-level localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). ACDF and posterior laminoplasty are performed for localized OPLL at the disc and vertebral body levels, respectively. Eighty six patients with two-level localized OPLL who underwent surgery from January 2011 to December 2016 were retrospectively investigated (41, ACDF group; 45, laminoplasty group). Clinical outcomes were reviewed, and radiologic results such as occupying ratio (OR), space available in the spinal cord, cranial and caudal OPLL-to-disc distance (ODD)/posterior body height (PBH) ratios, segmental angle, C2–C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and range of motion were investigated. Patients were followed-up for an average of 42.7 ± 10.5 months. Clinical outcomes, postoperative OR, and space available in the spinal cord were significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups. Preoperatively, the OR and cranial and caudal ODD/PBH ratios were not significantly different between the groups. Compared to pre-operative values, differences in the segmental and C2–C7 Cobb angles at the final follow-up were statistically significant for the ACDF group ( P .05). The mean operative time, bleeding volume, and the duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the ACDF group than in the laminoplasty group ( P .05). Complications occurred in 1 ACDF case and in 5 laminoplasty cases. Both ACDF and laminoplasty provided satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes for two-level localized OPLL. However, ACDF was associated with a lower operation time, bleeding loss, duration of hospitalization, and complications.
机译:我们进行了一种回顾性研究,比较了前宫颈椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)和后层晶状体术的临床和放射性结果,用于两级局部韧带化(OPLL)的两级局部骨化。 ACDF和后层压成形术分别用于椎间盘和椎体水平的局部OPL1。八十六名患有2011年1月至2016年12月从2011年1月至2016年12月接受手术的两级本地化OPL1的患者(41,ACDF组; 45,层形术组)。综述临床结果,以及占用率(或),脊髓,颅骨和尾部OPL-盘距离(奇数)/后体高度(PBH)比率,节段角,C2-C7的空间COBB角度,T1斜率,C2-C7矢状垂直轴(SVA)和运动范围。患者的出访平均为42.7±10.5个月。两组的最终随访中,脊髓术后,术后或空间和空间可显着改善。术前,组或颅骨和尾状奇数/ PBH比在组之间没有显着差异。与术前值相比,最终随访中的节段性和C2-C7 Cobb角度的差异对于ACDF组有统计学意义(P <.05)。 ACDF组的平均手术时间,出血量和住院期的持续时间显着低于层压术组(P <.05)。并发症发生在1例ACDF案例中,在5个层压术病例中发生。 ACDF和椎板成形术均为两级局部化OPLL提供令人满意的临床和放射学结果。然而,ACDF与较低的操作时间,出血损失,住院时间和并发症相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号