...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance
【24h】

Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance

机译:搜索狗处理程序在评分自己的狗的表现时显示出积极的偏见

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Self-assessments of performance are commonly used in the human workplace, although compared to peer or supervisor ratings, they may be subject to positive biases or leniency. The use of subjective ratings scales in animal sciences is also common, although little consideration is usually given to possible rater bias. Dog handlers, work very closely and form strong relationships with their dogs but are also best placed to monitor dog performance since they often work in isolation. Previous work found ratings of search dog performance correlated well between experienced dog trainers, instructors, and scientists; but until now, there has been no investigation into ratings made by a dog’s own handler. We compared handlers’ subjective assessment of their own dog’s search performance to scores given by other handlers and in a second study, to scores made by impartial raters. We found that handlers generally showed leniency; for example scoring their own dogs more favourably for Control (responsiveness to commands) and Strength of Indication. But the degree of bias varied with the trait being scored and between raters. Such differences may be attributable to greater desirability or importance of favourable scores for certain traits, or a lack of clarity of their precise meaning. Handlers may vary in susceptibility to bias due to differing levels of experience and the extent to which they view their dog’s ability as dependent on their own. The exact causes require further investigation. We suggest working dog agencies provide rater-training to overcome leniency, improve reliability and validity, and to increase handler’s motivation to provide accurate assessments. This study represents one of a series of steps to formulate robust, validated and evidence-based performance rating systems and has relevance to any situation where raters assess their own performance or others (particularly where they may have a vested interest in, or loyalty towards, the ratee).
机译:性能的自我评估通常用于人类工作场所,尽管与对等或主管的评级相比,它们可能受到正偏见或宽大。在动物科学中使用主观评级尺度也很常见,尽管通常考虑可能的额定偏差。狗搬运工,非常紧密地工作,形成与他们的狗的强大关系,但也最好放置在监控狗的表现,因为它们经常在隔离中工作。以前的工作发现搜索犬表现的评级在经验丰富的狗培训师,教练和科学家之间相关;但到目前为止,狗自己的处理程序的评分没有调查。我们将处理器的主观评估对自己的狗的搜索性能进行比较,以其他处理程序和第二项研究给予的分数,以公正的评估者所做的分数。我们发现处理程序通常表现出宽大;例如,对自己的狗更有利地进行控制(对命令的响应)和指示强度。但是偏差程度随着特征而变化,而在评级之间则变化。这种差异可能是由于某些特征的有利分数的更大或重要性,或缺乏其精确含义的缺乏清晰度。由于不同的经验水平以及他们认为他们的狗能力的程度,处理器可能因偏差而变化而变化。确切的原因需要进一步调查。我们建议工作犬代理商提供评定培训,以克服宽大,提高可靠性和有效性,并提高处理程序的动力,以提供准确的评估。本研究代表了制定强大,验证和证据基于绩效评级系统的一系列步骤之一,并与评估者评估自己的表现或其他人的任何情况有关(特别是在他们可能对或忠诚的情况下,速度)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号