首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Neuroinformatics >Magia: Robust Automated Image Processing and Kinetic Modeling Toolbox for PET Neuroinformatics
【24h】

Magia: Robust Automated Image Processing and Kinetic Modeling Toolbox for PET Neuroinformatics

机译:MAGIA:宠物神经素信息学的强大自动图像处理和动力学建模工具箱

获取原文
       

摘要

Processing of positron emission tomography (PET) data typically involves manual work, causing inter-operator variance. Here we introduce the Magia toolbox that enables processing of brain PET data with minimal user intervention. We investigated the accuracy of Magia with four tracers: [ ~(11)C]carfentanil, [ ~(11)C]raclopride, [ ~(11)C]MADAM, and [ ~(11)C]PiB. We used data from 30 control subjects for each tracer. Five operators manually delineated reference regions for each subject. The data were processed using Magia using the manually and automatically generated reference regions. We first assessed inter-operator variance resulting from the manual delineation of reference regions. We then compared the differences between the manually and automatically produced reference regions and the subsequently obtained binding potentials and standardized-uptake-value-ratios. The results show that manually produced reference regions can be remarkably different from each other, leading to substantial differences also in outcome measures. While the Magia-derived reference regions were anatomically different from the manual ones, Magia produced outcome measures highly consistent with the average of the manually obtained estimates. For [ ~(11)C]carfentanil and [ ~(11)C]PiB there was no bias, while for [ ~(11)C]raclopride and [ ~(11)C]MADAM Magia produced 3–5% higher binding potentials. Based on these results and considering the high inter-operator variance of the manual method, we conclude that Magia can be reliably used to process brain PET data.
机译:正电子发射断层扫描(PET)数据的处理通常涉及手动工作,导致操作间方差。在这里,我们介绍了MAGIA工具箱,可以通过最小的用户干预处理大脑宠物数据。我们调查了用四个示踪剂的麦比亚的准确性:[〜(11)c]甘蔗硅,[〜(11)c] raclopride,[〜(11)c] madam,[〜(11)c] pib。我们为每个示踪剂的30个控制主题使用数据。五个运营商手动描绘每个主题的参考区域。使用Magia使用手动和自动生成的参考区域处理数据。我们首先评估了手动描绘参考区域的互操作差异。然后,将手动和自动产生的参考区域和随后获得的结合电位和标准化吸收值 - 比的差异进行了比较。结果表明,手动产生的参考区彼此可以显着不同,导致结果措施中也具有显着差异。虽然MAGIA衍生的参考区与手动源性不同,但MAGIA产生的结果与手动获得的估计的平均值高度一致。对于[〜(11)c] carfentanil和[〜(11)c] pib没有偏差,而对于[〜(11)c] raclopride和[〜(11)c] Madam magia产生3-5%的结合潜力。基于这些结果,并考虑了手动方法的高算机间变异,我们得出结论,麦迪亚可以可靠地用于处理脑宠物数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号