首页> 外文期刊>Malaria Journal >In vivo / ex vivo efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso
【24h】

In vivo / ex vivo efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso

机译:在蒿甲醚 - Lumefantrine和Artesunate-Amodiaina的体内/前体内疗效作为儿童简单的恶性疟疾疟疾的一线治疗:在布基纳法索中的一个开放标签随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract BackgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is recommended to improve malaria treatment efficacy and limit drug-resistant parasites selection in malaria endemic areas. 5?years after they were adopted, the efficacy and safety of artemether–lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate–amodiaquine (ASAQ), the first-line treatments for uncomplicated malaria were assessed in Burkina Faso.MethodsIn total, 440 children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomized to receive either AL or ASAQ for 3?days and were followed up weekly for 42?days. Blood samples were collected to investigate the ex vivo susceptibility of P. falciparum isolates to lumefantrine, dihydroartemisinin (the active metabolite of artemisinin derivatives) and monodesethylamodiaquine (the active metabolite of amodiaquine). The modified isotopic micro test technique was used to determine the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values. Primary endpoints were the risks of treatment failure at days 42.ResultsOut of the 440 patients enrolled, 420 (95.5%) completed the 42?days follow up. The results showed a significantly higher PCR unadjusted cure rate in ASAQ arm (71.0%) than that in the AL arm (49.8%) on day 42, and this trend was similar after correction by PCR, with ASAQ performing better (98.1%) than AL (91.1%). Overall adverse events incidence was low and not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Ex vivo results showed that 6.4% P. falciparum isolates were resistant to monodesthylamodiaquine. The coupled in vivo / ex vivo analysis showed increased IC50 values for lumefantrine and monodesethylamodiaquine at day of recurrent parasitaemia compared to baseline values while for artesunate, IC50 values remained stable at baseline and after treatment failure (p??0.05).ConclusionThese findings provide substantial evidence that AL and ASAQ are highly efficacious for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children in Burkina Faso. However, the result of P. falciparum susceptibility to the partner drugs advocates the need to regularly replicate such surveillance studies. This would be particularly indicated when amodiaquine is associated in seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis (SMC) mass drug administration in children under 5?years in Burkina Faso.
机译:摘要建议基于术术术基因素的组合疗法(ACT),以改善疟疾治疗疗效,并限制抗药性寄生虫在疟疾流行区域中选择。 5?曾经采用过,艺术品 - Lumefantrine(Al)和artesunate-Amodiaquine(ASAQ)的疗效和安全性,在Burkina Faso.Methodsin总,440名患有简单的疟原虫的疟原虫的疟疾进行评估疟疾被随机地接受3个?天或asaq,并随访42天。收集血液样品以研究对Lumefantrine,二氢氨基蛋白(阿尔美霉素衍生物的活性代谢物)和单甲胺(Amodiaquine的活性代谢物)对Lumefantrine的前体内易感性。改性同位素微试验技术用于确定50%抑制浓度(IC 50)值。主要终点是治疗失败的风险在第42天。440名患者注册的440名患者,420(95.5%)完成了42个月。结果表明,在第42天(49.8%)的asaq臂(71.0%)中的PCR未经调节的固化速率显着更高,PCR校正后这种趋势类似,asaq表现更好(98.1%) Al(91.1%)。整体不良事件发生率低,两种治疗臂之间没有显着差异。前体内结果表明,6.4%的恶性疟原虫分离株对单粒细胞耐药。偶联的体内/前体内分析表明,与基线值相比,与基线值相比,Lumefantrine和Mododesethynodiquine的增加的IC50值与artesunate相比,IC50值在基线和治疗失败后保持稳定(P?> 0.05)。结论这些结果Al和Asaq对Burkina Faso的儿童的不复杂性疟疾进行了高度有效的证据。然而,对伴侣药物的P. falciparum易感性的结果倡导有必要定期复制这种监测研究。当Amodiaine在季节性疟疾中化学嗜症症(SMC)大规模药物管理局在5岁以下的儿童中的疟疾嗜症剂(SMC)大众药物施用时特别表明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号