首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychiatry >Interpersonal Psychotherapy vs. Treatment as Usual for Major Depression Related to Work Stress: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
【24h】

Interpersonal Psychotherapy vs. Treatment as Usual for Major Depression Related to Work Stress: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study

机译:与工作压力相关的主要抑郁症的人际心理治疗与常规进行治疗:试点随机对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Depressive disorders are among the leading causes of sick leave and long-term work incapacity in most modern countries. Work related stress is described by patients as the most common context of depression. It is vital to know what types of treatments are effective in improving work related problems and occupational health. However, there is only limited evidence on work-focused interventions. Methods: The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and generate first data on the effectiveness of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) adapted as a group program to focus on the work context (W-IPT). In total, 28 outpatients (22 women; M = 49.8 years old) with Major Depressive Disorder related to work stress were randomized to 8 weekly group sessions of W-IPT or to treatment as usual (TAU; guideline oriented treatment). Primary endpoint was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24) score. Key secondary endpoints were, among others, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Work Ability Index (WAI), Return to Work Attitude (RTW-SE), and the Effort-Reward-Imbalance (ERI). In addition, we evaluated the participants' overall satisfaction with the W-IPT program by two items. A follow-up assessment was conducted 3 months after end of acute treatment. Results: W-IPT was significantly more effective than TAU in reducing clinician-assessed depressive symptoms at follow-up (HRSD-24 W-IPT/TAU: M = 6.6/12.0, SE: 1.46/2.17, t _((df = 1)) = ?2.24, p = 0.035, d = 0.79) and self-assessed depression (BDI-II W-IPT/TAU post-treatment: M = 8.8/18.8, SE: 1.69/2.70, t _((df = 1)) = ?3.82, p = 0.001, d = 1.28; follow-up: M = 8.8/16.1, SE: 1.62/2.26, t _((df = 1)) = ?2.62, p = 0.015, d = 0.99). Furthermore, W-IPT was superior in improving work-ability (WAI), return-to-work attitude (RTW-SE), and the effort-reward-ratio (ERI). No dropouts were observed in both groups. The vast majority (89 percent) of participants in the W-IPT condition were “very satisfied” with the program, although wishing for a greater number of sessions (75 percent). Conclusions: A work-focused IPT program for the treatment of depression associated to work stress was feasible and highly acceptable. W-IPT turned out to be more effective than standard treatment in reducing depression and work-related problems. However, further evidence in a multicenter trial extending this pilot study is necessary.
机译:背景:抑郁症是大多数现代国家的病假和长期工作的主要原因中。工作相关的压力是由患者描述为最常见的抑郁背景。重要的是知道什么类型的治疗在改善工作相关问题和职业健康方面是有效的。但是,有关以工作为中心的干预措施只有有限的证据。方法:我们的研究目的是评估可行性和产生关于人际关系心理治疗的有效性(IPT)的可行性(IPT),适用于集团计划,以专注于工作环境(W-IPT)。总共28名门诊病人(22名女性; M = 49.8岁),与工作压力有关的主要抑郁症是随机的,随机分为8周的W-IPT或通常的治疗(TAU;指导指导治疗)。主要终点是抑郁症(HRSD-24)得分的汉密尔顿评级规模。关键次要终点是Beck抑郁库存(BDI-II),工作能力指数(WAI),返回工作态度(RTW-SE),以及努力奖励 - 不平衡(ERI)。此外,我们通过两个项目评估了与W-IPT计划的总体满意度。急性治疗结束后3个月进行后续评估。结果:W-IPT在减少随访时减少临床医生评估的抑郁症状(HRSD-24 W-IPT / TAU:M = 6.6 / 12.0,SE:1.46 / 2.17,T _((df = 1))=?2.24,p = 0.035,d = 0.79)和自我评估的抑郁症(BDI-II W-IPT / TAU处理后:M = 8.8 / 18.8,SE:1.69 / 2.70,T _((DF = 1))=?3.82,p = 0.001,d = 1.28;随访:m = 8.8 / 16.1,se:1.62 / 2.26,t _((df = 1))=?2.62,p = 0.015,d = 0.99)。此外,W-IPT在改善工作能力(WAI),返回工作态度(RTW-SE)以及努力奖励比(ERI)方面优越。两组没有观察到辍学。对于W-IPT条件的绝大多数(89%)的参与者与该计划“非常满意”,尽管希望达到更多的会议(75%)。结论:为治疗与工作压力相关的抑郁症进行了重点的IPT计划是可行和高度可接受的。 W-IPT在减少抑郁和与工作有关的问题方面比标准治疗更有效。但是,需要在延长这项试验研究的多中心试验中的进一步证据是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号