...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Plant Science >A Tree-Centered Approach to Assess Impacts of Extreme Climatic Events on Forests
【24h】

A Tree-Centered Approach to Assess Impacts of Extreme Climatic Events on Forests

机译:以树为中心的方法,评估极端气候事件对森林的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction A major task of our society is to manage forests in a way that their resources are preserved to meet future generation needs (Forest Europe et al., 2015 ). Current scenarios of climate change effects are making this task extremely challenging (Kirilenko and Sedjo, 2007 ). Climate shifts will impact forest vitality and affect goods and services forests provide, including carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation (IPCC, 2014 ). To guide sustainable forest management, forest researchers are asked to provide concrete answers about forest resilience in response to expected climatic trends, and extreme climatic events (Lindner et al., 2014 ). This is not an easy task, because responses of trees and forest ecosystems to environmental conditions are often non-linear and moreover vary on spatial and temporal scales (Smith, 2011 ; Anderegg et al., 2012 ; Reichstein et al., 2013 ). For instance, although drought is one of the most frequent and widespread climatic extremes affecting forests worldwide (e.g., Allen et al., 2010 ), the assessment of its impact on future forests is currently under intense debate. Mechanisms behind tree growth and mortality are complex (McDowell et al., 2008 , 2011 ; Fatichi et al., 2014 ; Anderegg et al., 2015 ; Meir et al., 2015 ). Besides strength or frequency of external factors, such as extreme events, also the tree's ability to resist and recover is relevant, which, in turn, is largely determined by intrinsic factors such as the tree's life stage, life history, and genetic characteristics.In this paper, we advocate for a tree-centered approach. By providing an improved mechanistic understanding of physiological and growth responses of trees growing under various conditions we can define the tree's capacity to respond to external stress factors. This concept can valuably contribute to the debate on how to shape future forests toward resilient forest ecosystems. A tree-centered approach Current spatiotemporal simulations on future forest growth responses to changing climate conditions are performed with dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs; Wullschleger et al., 2014 ). These models—usually generalizing tree species as plant functional types (PFTs)—provide valuable descriptions of the evolution of natural vegetation at a grid cell level under several climate scenarios. Such approaches are powerful in assessing growth responses related to the interaction between vegetation and atmosphere (including anthropogenic impact). However, although first steps toward representation of tree species, size classes, and forest structure in a DGVM were recently made (e.g., Naudts et al., 2016 ) they often lack to explain the variability between and within species, and often do not adequately explain growth responses (Fatichi et al., 2014 ) under varying site conditions, and to climatic extremes (Anderegg et al., 2015 ). These aspects are however extremely relevant to evaluate plasticity of tree individuals and tree species and the resilience of forests under changing climatic conditions, especially considering changing frequencies and intensities of climatic extremes (Reyer et al., 2013 ).The tree-centered approach proposed here considers the individual tree as main source of information for understanding variability in growth responses. Comprehensive investigations using well-selected trees growing under different environmental conditions foster a better understanding of projected large-scale forest responses to changing climate. In comparison to generalizing approaches using PFTs, the tree-centered approach yields information with less spatial coverage but with the potential to convey more details on specific tree responses to a given climatic factor. This knowledge complements other approaches and can for instance support forest managers in tree species and/or provenance selection to better prepare specific forest stands to cope with expected challenges. Four important elements The incentive for the tree-centered approach is gaining a process-based understanding on tree responses to changing environmental conditions on temporal scales varying from short-term responses to climatic extreme events to long time periods matching the life cycles of tree populations. This can be achieved through an ensemble of observational studies on a selection of trees from different species and life histories, growing in diverse settings (forest types, species composition, successional stages, management regimes), and exposed to different climates and extreme climatic events. Establishing such a model framework requires the following elements: In-depth understanding of causal processes occurring within the tree in response to environmental changes. The cascade of physiological and growth responses is assessed by an integration of real-time observations of physiological and structural growth responses. Assessment of the link between tree structure and function. This allows for evaluation of the
机译:引言我们社会的主要任务是管理森林,以便他们的资源保存以满足未来的一代需求(森林欧洲等,2015)。目前的气候变化效应的情景使这项任务非常具有挑战性(Kirilenko和Sedjo,2007)。气候变化将影响森林活力,影响商品和服务森林,包括碳封存和气候变化缓解(IPCC,2014)。为了引导可持续的森林管理,森林研究人员被要求提供有关森林复原力的具体答案,以应对预期的气候趋势和极端气候事件(Lindner等,2014)。这不是一项简单的任务,因为树木和森林生态系统对环境条件的反应通常是非线性的,而且随着空间和时间尺度而变化(史密斯,2011; Anderegg等,2012; Reichstein等,2013)。例如,虽然干旱是影响全世界森林的最常见和广泛的气候极端之一(例如,Allen等,2010),但对未来森林的影响的评估目前正在激烈的辩论中。树木增长和死亡率的机制是复杂的(McDowell等,2008,2011; Fatichi等,2014; Anderegg等,2015; Meir等,2015)。除了外部因素的强度或频率之外,如极端事件,还有树的抗蚀能力和恢复的能力是相关的,这反过来又主要由树立生命阶段,生命历史和遗传特征等内在因素决定本文,我们倡导以树为中心的方法。通过提供改进的机械理解在各种条件下生长的树木生理和生长反应,我们可以定义树木对外部压力因素的应对的能力。这一概念可以有价值地促进关于如何将未来森林塑造对弹性森林生态系统的辩论。以动态的全球植被模型(DGVMS; WULLSCHLEGER等,2014)进行了一系列关于改变气候条件的未来森林生长响应对未来森林生长响应的现行时空模拟。这些模型 - 通常是普遍性的树种作为植物功能类型(PFT) - 在几个气候情景下,网格单元水平在网格单元水平下的天然植被演变的有价值描述。这些方法是强大的,用于评估与植被和大气之间的相互作用(包括人为影响)相关的生长响应。然而,尽管最近进行了第一次迈出了DGVM中的树种,大小类和森林结构的第一步(例如,NAUDTS等,2016),他们往往缺乏在物种之间和在物种之间的可变性,并且通常不会充分解释增长响应(Fatichi等,2014)在不同的场地条件下,并对气候极值(Anderegg等,2015)。然而,这些方面非常相关,以评估树木种类和树种的可塑性以及在不断变化的气候条件下的森林的可塑性,特别是考虑变化的频率和气候极端的强度(Reyer等,2013)。这里提出的树木中心方法将个别树视为理解增长响应变异性的主要信息来源。综合调查在不同环境条件下生长的良好树木促进了对改变气候的预计大规模森林反应更好地了解。与使用PFT的概括方法相比,树木中心的方法产生具有较少空间覆盖率的信息,但是有可能在对给定气候因子的特定树响应中传送更多细节。这种知识补充了其他方法,并且可以例如支持树种和/或出处选择的森林经理,以更好地准备特定的森林,以应对预期的挑战。四个重要的元素对树木中心的激励是基于过程的理解,对树木响应改变了对时间尺度的环境条件,从短期回答到气候极端事件到符合树种群生命周期的长时间。这可以通过对来自不同物种和生命历史的各种树木的观察研究的集合来实现,在不同的环境中生长(森林类型,物种组成,连续阶段,管理制度),并暴露于不同的气候和极端气候事件。建立这种模型框架需要以下元素:深入了解树内发生的因果过程,以响应环境变化。通过整合生理和结构生长反应的实时观察来评估生理和生长反应的级联。评估树结构与功能之间的联系。这允许评估

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号