...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering >Assessment of CO2 and NOx Emissions of One Diesel and One Bi-Fuel Gasoline/CNG Euro 6 Vehicles During Real-World Driving and Laboratory Testing
【24h】

Assessment of CO2 and NOx Emissions of One Diesel and One Bi-Fuel Gasoline/CNG Euro 6 Vehicles During Real-World Driving and Laboratory Testing

机译:在现实世界驾驶和实验室检测期间,评估一只柴油和一只双燃料汽油/ CNG欧元6辆车的二氧化碳和NOx排放量

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this study is the assessment of the real-world environmental performance, and the comparison with laboratory measurements, of two Euro 6 passenger cars. The first is equipped with a common-rail diesel engine, Lean NOx Trap (LNT) and Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF), and the second is a bi-fuel gasoline/CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) one, equipped with Three Way Catalyst (TWC). The experimental campaign consisted of on-road and chassis dynamometer measurements. In the former test set, two driving routes were followed, one complying with the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) regulation, and another characterized by more dynamic driving. The aim of the latter route was to go beyond the regulatory limits and cover a wider range of real-world conditions and engine operating area. In the laboratory, the WLTC (Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle) was tested, applying the real-world road load of the vehicles. Both cars underwent the same tests, and these were repeated for the primary (CNG) and the secondary (gasoline) fuel of the bi-fuel vehicle. In all the tests, CO2 and NOx emissions were measured with a Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS). The results were analyzed on two levels, the aggregated and the instantaneous, in order to highlight the different emissions attributes under varying driving conditions. The application of the realistic road load in the WLTC limited its difference with the RDE compliant route, in terms of CO2 emissions. However, the aggressive driver behavior and the uphill roads of the Dynamic driving schedule resulted in around double CO2 emissions for both cars. The potential of natural gas to reduce CO2 emissions was also highlighted. Concerning the diesel car NOx emissions, the real-world results were significantly higher than the respective WLTC levels. On the other hand, the bi-fuel car exhibited very low NOx emissions with both fuels. Natural gas resulted in increased NOx emissions, compared to gasoline, always remaining below the Euro 6 limit, with only exception the Dynamic driving schedule. Finally, it was found that the overall cycle dynamics are not sufficient for the complete assessment of transient emissions and the instantaneous engine and aftertreatment behavior can reveal additional details.
机译:本研究的目的是评估现实世界的环境绩效,以及与两欧元6欧元乘用车的实验室测量比较。首先配备了共轨柴油发动机,瘦NOx陷阱(LNT)和柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF),第二个是双燃料汽油/ CNG(压缩天然气),配备三种催化剂( TWC)。实验活动由路上和底盘测力计测量组成。在前一种测试集中,遵循两个驾驶路线,符合真正的驾驶排放(RDE)调节,另一个特征在于更多的动态驾驶。后一条路线的目的是超越监管限额,涵盖更广泛的现实条件和发动机运行区。在实验室中,测试了WLTC(全球统一的轻型车辆测试循环),应用了车辆的真实路线负荷。两辆汽车经历了相同的测试,对双燃料辆的初级(CNG)和二级(汽油)燃料重复这些车辆。在所有测试中,使用便携式排放测量系统(PEMS)测量CO2和NOx排放。结果分析了两级,聚合和瞬间,以突出不同的驱动条件下的不同排放属性。在WLTC中的逼真道路载荷在二氧化碳排放方面限制了其与RDE兼容路线的差异。然而,侵略性的驾驶员行为和动态驾驶时间表的上坡道路导致两辆汽车的双CO2排放量。还突出了天然气减少二氧化碳排放的潜力。关于柴油汽车NOx排放,现实世界的结果显着高于各自的WLTC水平。另一方面,双燃料汽车与两个燃料表现出非常低的NOx排放。与汽油相比,天然气导致NOx排放量增加,总是剩下低于欧元6限制,只有动态驾驶时间表。最后,发现整个周期动态不足以完全评估瞬态排放和瞬时发动机和后处理行为可以揭示其他细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号