首页> 外文期刊>Forest Science and Technology >Productivity and cost of whole-tree and tree-length harvesting in fuel reduction thinning treatments using cable yarding systems
【24h】

Productivity and cost of whole-tree and tree-length harvesting in fuel reduction thinning treatments using cable yarding systems

机译:使用电缆造型系统生产燃油减少稀释处理中全棵树和树长收获的生产力和成本

获取原文
           

摘要

Cable yarding systems are often used to reduce hazardous fuels in dense overstocked forest stands on steep terrain (>35%) in the western United States. However, treatment costs tend to be high. The aim of this study was to broaden our knowledge by evaluating two different harvesting methods (whole-tree (WT) and tree-length (TL)) used for fuel reduction thinning treatment on mixed-conifer forest stand. Different harvesting methods greatly affected the productivity and cost of fuel reduction thinning, especially in felling and yarding operations. Total sawlog removal costs (stump-to-truck) were US$26.13/m~(3) in the WT-harvested unit and US$24.01/m~(3) in TL harvested unit. TL thinning resulted in higher felling time and lower production rate due to increased amounts of time for processing trees at the stump. In yarding operation, however, TL method had a higher production rate than WT method because TL method had higher number of pieces per yarding cycle. Processing production rates at a landing were relatively similar throughout treatments although trees in a TL thinning unit were already limbed and bucked at the stump. Loading productivity was consistent throughout treatments because loading occurred independently from other activities. For fuel reduction thinning treatments using a cable yarding system, TL thinning was more cost-effective than WT thinning if leaving tree tops and branches on site is acceptable from a fuels management perspective.
机译:电缆造架系统通常用于减少茂密过度的森林中的危险燃料在美国西部的陡峭地球(> 35%)中。然而,治疗成本往往很高。本研究的目的是通过评估用于在混合针叶树林立场上的燃油还原细化处理的两种不同的收获方法(全棵树(WT)和树长(TL))来扩大我们的知识。不同的收获方法极大地影响了减少燃料减少的生产率和成本,尤其是在砍伐和衡量运营中。 WT-Crouded单位的锯齿删除成本(Stupp-to-Take)的成本(Stupp-to-Take)为26.13 / m〜(3)美元,在TL收获单位中为24.01 / m〜(3)。由于在树桩上加工树木的时间增加,TL变薄导致较高的次数和降低的生产率。然而,在造架操作中,TL方法的生产率比WT方法更高,因为TL方法每码循环具有较高数量的碎片。虽然TL稀疏单元中的树木在树桩上已经被限定并折叠,但在处理中的加工生产率相对相似。在整个治疗过程中加工生产率是一致的,因为负载发生在其他活动中。对于使用电缆造架系统的燃油减少细化处理,如果在燃料管理的角度下可以接受现场的树顶和分支,TL细化比WT稀薄更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号