首页> 外文期刊>Evidence Based Library and Information Practice >Understanding EBLIP at an Organizational Level: An Initial Maturity Model
【24h】

Understanding EBLIP at an Organizational Level: An Initial Maturity Model

机译:在组织级别了解EBLIP:初始成熟度模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Objective - Existing research around evidence based practice in the LIS (library and information science) professional context over the past two decades has captured the experience of individual practitioners, rather than the organization as a whole. Current models of evidence based library and information practice (EBLIP) relate to, and apply predominantly to, individuals or specific scenarios. Yet despite a growing demand from institutional and library leaders for evidence to demonstrate why investments in libraries should continue, little is known about how an organization can enhance its maturity in evidence based practice. This paper addresses this gap by seeking to understand what an evidence based university library looks like and answering the questions: how does a university library leader know the library’s service and practice is evidence based? How can a university library measure and progress its maturity in evidence based practice? Methods - Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with library professionals employed at Australian and New Zealand university libraries. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The interviews, combined with a literature review and environmental scan of evidence based practices in university libraries, informed the development of a draft capability maturity model as a framework for developing evidence based practice in university libraries. Results - The model identifies and describes characteristics at five different levels of evidence based practice maturity from least mature (Ad hoc/Sporadic) to most mature (Transforming). Three dimensions of experience help to define the characteristics at each level of maturity and provide a framework to understand how a university library might develop its organizational capacity in evidence based library and information practice. Conclusion - Library leaders and practitioners will benefit from the model as they seek to identify and build upon their evidence based practice maturity, enabling more robust decision-making, a deeper understanding of their clients and demonstration of value and impact to their stakeholders.
机译:摘要目的 - 在过去二十年中,LIS(图书馆和信息科学)循证实践的现有研究已经捕获了个别从业者的经验,而不是整个组织。目前的基于证据库和信息实践(EBLIP)涉及,主要应用于个人或特定方案。尽管越来越多的机构和图书馆领导人的需求,但证据表明为什么在图书馆的投资应该继续投资,但对于组织如何在基于证据的实践中提升其成熟度的知之甚少。本文通过寻求了解基于证据的大学图书馆看起来像和回答问题:大学图书馆领导人如何知道图书馆的服务和实践是基于证据大学图书馆如何在基于证据的实践中衡量并进展其成熟?方法 - 在澳大利亚和新西兰图书馆雇用图书馆专业人员进行了16项半结构化访谈。使用主题分析技术分析转录物。面试,结合大学图书馆的基于证据的文献审查和环境扫描,告知了一个能力成熟度模型的发展,作为大学图书馆发展证据的框架。结果 - 模型识别并描述了从最小成熟(Ad Hoc /散发)到最成熟(转化)的五种不同循证验证的特征。经验的三个维度有助于定义每个成熟度水平的特征,并提供框架,以了解大学图书馆如何在基于证据的图书馆和信息实践中发展其组织能力。结论 - 图书馆领导人和从业者将从模型中受益,因为他们寻求识别和建立在基于证据的实践成熟度,使得更加强大的决策,更深入地了解他们的客户和对他们的利益攸关方的价值和影响的证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号