首页> 外文期刊>Engenharia Agrícola >Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest
【24h】

Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest

机译:机械化和半机械化马铃薯收获的操作性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Potato is an important crop plant throughout the world. Harvesting is a fundamental step in its production system. Maybe, it is the most complex and expensive operation. Thus, the objective of this work was to compare the cost of the mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest, the operational capacity and the production losses during the potato harvest process. The work was accomplished in a commercial farming, cultivated under pivot system, in the municipal district of Perdizes - MG, Brazil. A completely randomized design with two treatments was used: mechanized and semi-mechanized harvest. The mechanized harvest used a self-propelled harvester. In the semi-automated harvest, a digger mounted on tractor was used and the potato was manually harvested. It was concluded that the cost of mechanized harvest was 49.03% lower than the cost of semi-mechanized harvest. On average, the harvester had a work for 23 workers in manual harvest. Mechanized harvest showed losses of 2.35% of potato yield, while the semi-mechanized harvest showed losses of 6.32%.
机译:土豆是全世界重要的作物植物。收获是其生产系统的基本步骤。也许,它是最复杂和最昂贵的操作。因此,这项工作的目的是将机械化和半机械化收获的成本进行比较,在马铃薯收获过程中的机械化和半机械化收获的成本,运营能力和生产损失。这项工作是在枢轴系统培养的商业养殖中完成的,在巴西·米格,巴西·曼特区。使用具有两种处理的完全随机的设计:机械化和半机械化收获。机械化的收获使用了自推进的收割机。在半自动收获中,使用安装在拖拉机上的挖掘机,手动收获马铃薯。得出结论,机械化收获成本低于半机械化收获成本的49.03%。平均而言,收割机在手动收获中有23名工人工作。机械化收获显示出2.35%的马铃薯产量的损失,而半机械化的收获显示出6.32%的损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号