...
首页> 外文期刊>Global change biology bioenergy >Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel
【24h】

Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel

机译:是木本生物能源碳中性吗?从木质生物能源和化石燃料消耗排放的比较评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Under the current accounting systems, emissions produced when biomass is burnt for energy are accounted as zero, resulting in what is referred to as the ‘carbon neutrality’ assumption. However, if current harvest levels are increased to produce more bioenergy, carbon that would have been stored in the biosphere might be instead released in the atmosphere. This study utilizes a comparative approach that considers emissions under alternative energy supply options. This approach shows that the emission benefits of bioenergy compared to use of fossil fuel are time-dependent. It emerges that the assumption that bioenergy always results in zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to use of fossil fuels can be misleading, particularly in the context of short-to-medium term goals. While it is clear that all sources of woody bioenergy from sustainably managed forests will produce emission reductions in the long term, different woody biomass sources have various impacts in the short-medium term. The study shows that the use of forest residues that are easily decomposable can produce GHG benefits compared to use of fossil fuels from the beginning of their use and that biomass from dedicated plantations established on marginal land can be carbon neutral from the beginning of its use. However, the risk of short-to-medium term negative impacts is high when additional fellings are extracted to produce bioenergy and the proportion of felled biomass used for bioenergy is low, or when land with high C stocks is converted to low productivity bioenergy plantations. The method used in the study provides an instrument to identify the time-dependent pattern of emission reductions for alternative bioenergy sources. In this way, decision makers can evaluate which bioenergy options are most beneficial for meeting short-term GHG emission reduction goals and which ones are more appropriate for medium to longer term objectives.
机译:在目前的会计系统下,生物量被烧焦的排放被占用为零,导致被称为“碳中性”假设。然而,如果增加当前的收获水平以产生更多的生物能量,则可能在气氛中储存在生物圈中的碳。本研究利用了一种对比较方法,即在替代能源供应方面考虑排放。这种方法表明,与使用化石燃料的使用相比,生物能量的发射益处是时间依赖性的。它出现了与化石燃料的使用相比,生物能源总是导致零温室气体(GHG)排放的假设可能会误导,特别是在短到中期目标的背景下。虽然很明显,从可持续管理的森林中的所有木质生物能源来源都会产生长期减排,但不同的木质生物质源在短中期具有各种影响。该研究表明,与使用从使用开始的化石燃料的使用和在边缘土地上建立的专用种植园的使用,使用森林残留物的使用可以产生温室气体益处,从而可以从其使用开始就可以是碳中性的。然而,当提取额外的砍伐以产生生物能量时,短到中期术语负面影响的风险很高,并且用于生物能量的鼠标生物量的比例低,或者当用高C股的土地转化为低生产率生物能源种植园时。该研究中使用的方法提供了一种仪器,用于识别替代生物能源来源的时间依赖性减排模式。通过这种方式,决策者可以评估哪些生物能源选项对于满足短期气体排放减少目标最有利,并且哪些是更适合中等到长期目标的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号