首页> 外文期刊>Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation. >Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient
【24h】

Palliative Care in the Hip Fracture Patient

机译:髋关节骨折患者的姑息治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Older patients with hip fracture have a 20% to 30% mortality rate in the year after surgery. Nonoperative care has higher 1-year mortality rates and is generally only pursued in those with an extraordinarily high surgical risk. As the population ages, more patients with hip fracture may fall into this category. The orthopedic surgeon is typically the main consultant responsible for deciding between surgery and conservative management, and the reasoning behind one decision over the other is often poorly understood. We undertook a review to determine decision-making tools for surgery in high-risk patients with hip fracture. Materials and Methods: A review was conducted using PubMed to determine articles published using the terms palliative care, conservative care, nonoperative, hip fracture, orthopedic procedures, fracture fixation, and surgery. Our search resulted in 13 articles to review. These were further screened to determine tools for use in surgical decision-making. Results: Several potential decision-making tools were found in our search. The potential tools to identify patients who would benefit from nonoperative treatment included the Palliative Performance Scale for severe dementia, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Katz Activities of Daily Living scales for prefracture immobility, a combination of clinical signs and laboratory tests to determine risk of imminent death, and the Charlson Comorbidity Score for additional serious comorbidities. No tools have been prospectively tested in a clinical setting. Discussion: Evaluation of each patient using a variety of decision making tools should help the orthopedic surgeon determine which patients would be better suited to non-operative management. After determining the benefit of non-operative care, they must effectively allow the fracture to heal while ameliorating pain. Palliative care physicians can fulfill this role by providing support and symptom relief. Conclusions: Surgical decision-making for hip fracture repair in the elderly patients is not straight forward. Several tools may be helpful to the surgeon in determining who may be better suited for nonoperative care or a palliative care referral. Prospective data do not exist in these decision-making tools.
机译:介绍:手术后年度髋部骨折的老年患者有20%至30%的死亡率。非手术治疗具有更高的1年死亡率,通常仅在具有极高的手术风险的人中追求。随着种群年龄的,更多髋部骨折的患者可能属于这一类。整形外科医生通常是负责决定手术和保守管理的主要顾问,以及对另一个决定背后的推理通常很糟糕。我们进行了审查,以确定高危髋部骨折患者的手术制作工具。材料和方法:使用PubMed进行审查,以确定使用术语姑息治疗,保守护理,非手术,髋部骨折,矫形程序,断裂固定和手术公布的文章。我们搜索导致13条文章审查。进一步筛选这些以确定用于手术决策的工具。结果:我们的搜索中发现了几种潜在的决策工具。潜在的工具,用于识别非手术治疗的患者,包括严重痴呆症的姑息性绩效规模,劳动力的日常生活和日常生活尺度的日常生活尺度的血统活动,用于预制性不动,临床症状和实验室测试的组合,以确定风险迫在眉睫的死亡,以及额外严重合并症的查理合并症分数。在临床环境中未经前瞻性地测试任何工具。讨论:使用各种决策工具的每位患者的评估应该有助于整形外科医生确定哪些患者将更适合非操作性管理。在确定非手术护理的益处后,他们必须有效地允许骨折在改善疼痛时愈合。姑息治疗医师可以通过提供支持和症状浮雕来实现这一作用。结论:老年患者髋部骨折修复的手术决策并不直。几种工具可能对外科医生有所帮助地确定谁可能更适合非手术护理或姑息护理转诊。在这些决策工具中不存在预期数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号