首页> 外文期刊>Genus >The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update
【24h】

The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update

机译:第二个人口转型,1986-2020:子替代生育和上升的同居 - 全球更新

获取原文
       

摘要

The article considers the evolution of two “Second Demographic Tradition” (SDT) core characteristics: fertility postponement and the rise of cohabitation, with particular attention being given to the first two decades of the new century. It can be considered as the sequel to the concise overview of the SDT published earlier in the US Proceedings of the National Academy (PNAS) (Lesthaeghe, 2014). In the first section, three optimistic views concerning the evolution of fertility are considered: (i) rises due to the end of postponement, (ii) rises connected with advancing human development and (iii) rises associated with advancing gender equality. The focus in this section is mainly but not exclusively on the European experience and its large degree of variation in fertility patterns. It is argued that these three optimistic predictions of sustained fertility rises are mainly based on observations prior to 2010, with too much weight being given to four Nordic countries and too little to other Western European countries with very similar fertility levels. However, these expectations have been thwarted during the second decade, even in the presence of advances in human development and/or gender equality. Hence, the original SDT prediction of 1986 of sustained sub-replacement fertility still holds after 35 years. We expect this to continue during the third decade as well. Furthermore, single-factor explanations are not likely to do justice to far more intricate situations that are responsive to varying structural and ideational influences. In the second section, the evolution of cohabitation is traced in Europe, the USA and Canada, the Latin American countries, three East Asian populations and selected subSaharan cases. At the onset, cohabitation can start either from a SDT basis among the better educated or among the poorer classes following a pattern of disadvantage (POD). It is argued that the feature of cohabitation spreads rapidly among all social classes and across all education groups and that in the process of increasing cohabitation, the POD versus SDT argument loses its significance. On a global scale, the rise in cohabitation is contingent on two dimensions: (i) contrasting historical patterns of kinship organisation, including the position of women, and (ii) further advances of the “ethics revolution”, indicating the growing dominance of individual autonomy over traditional societal norms. As a result, no breakthroughs in the near future are expected in countries with a Muslim or Hindu tradition in which no such major cultural shifts have occurred so far.
机译:该文章考虑了两个“第二次人口统计传统”(SDT)核心特征的演变:生育延期和同居的兴起,特别注意新世纪的前二十年。它可以被认为是美国国家学院(PNAS)(Lesthaeghe,2014)之前发布的SDT的简明概述的续集。在第一部分中,考虑了有关生育能力演变的三个乐观观点:(i)由于推迟结束而上升,(ii)与推进人类发展有关的增加,(iii)与推进性别平等有关的升高。本节的重点是主要而不是欧洲经验,其生育模式的大量变化。人们认为,这三种乐观的肥力升高的预测主要是基于2010年之前的观察,其重量太大,给四个北欧国家,其他西欧国家的生育水平非常相似。然而,即使在人类发展和/或性别平等的进展情况下,这些预期也被挫败了。因此,1986年持续的子替代生育的原始SDT预测仍然在35年后持有。我们希望这在第三十年中继续这一点。此外,单因素解释不太可能对响应于不同结构和观点的影响而更加复杂的情况。在第二节中,同居的演变在欧洲,美国和加拿大,拉丁美洲国家,三个东亚人口和选定的亚拉南案件中追溯。在发病时,同居可以在缺点模式(POD)之后从SDT或较差的课程中开始。有人认为,同居的特征在所有社会阶层和所有教育群体中迅速传播,并且在增加同居的过程中,POD与SDT论证失去了重要性。在全球范围内,同居的增加取决于两个维度:(i)与妇女地位,(ii)“伦理革命”的进一步进步,对比妇女组织的历史模式,表明个人越来越多的历史传统社会规范的自主权。因此,在具有穆斯林或印度教传统的国家,预计不久将在不久的将来的突破是迄今为止没有发生这种主要的文化转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号