...
首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >Short-Term Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermal Stimulation on Acupoints for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study of a Randomized, Single-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial
【24h】

Short-Term Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency Thermal Stimulation on Acupoints for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Study of a Randomized, Single-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

机译:脉冲射频热刺激对慢性低腰痛穴位的短期疗效:随机,单盲,安慰剂对照试验的初步研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pain-relief efficacy of thermal stimulation induced by a pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) thermal stimulation applied to acupoints (APs) in patients with low back pain (LBP). The study was designed as a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Methods. Fifty-six LBP patients whose minimum pain intensity score on a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) was more than 30 mm were randomly allocated to either the placebo-controlled or the treatment group at a 11 ratio. The treatment and placebo-controlled groups received PRF thermal stimulation plus cupping therapy and cupping therapy only, respectively. Each patient was scheduled to receive a total of three treatment sessions over one week with allowing a window up to 4 days. Six of the 13 predefined APs were selected differently for each session depending on the change in patient’s symptoms and intensity of pain. The primary outcome was the mean difference between the placebo-controlled and treatment group of VAS changes from the baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Results. The patients’ reported VAS scores from baseline to the end of follow-up (average 9.8 days) were significantly decreased by 8.036 points (two-sided 95% CI, -11.841 to -4.231) and 13.393 points (two-sided 95% CI 17.198 to -9.588) in the treatment and the placebo-controlled groups, respectively. However, the change in VAS scores between the treatment group and the placebo-controlled group was not significantly different (2.015 mm, two-sided 95% CI -5.288 to 9.317). Conclusion. The trial results indicated that treatment with either PRF thermal stimulation with cupping therapy or cupping therapy alone effectively relieved LBP. The efficacy of PRF thermal stimulation combined with cupping therapy was not superior to that of cupping therapy alone. Trial registration number Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0002137). The trial was registered retrospectively on 10 November, 2016.
机译:背景。本研究的目的是评估脉冲射频(PRF)热刺激诱导的热刺激疼痛的疼痛效果,其在患者患者(LBP)中施加到穴位(APS)。该研究被设计为随机,单盲,安慰剂对照试验。方法。五十六个LBP患者,其最小疼痛强度评分在视觉模拟刻度(VAS,0-100mm)以11比例随机分配给安慰剂控制或治疗组的30mm以30mm。治疗和安慰剂对照组分别仅接受PRF热刺激加上拔罐疗法和拔罐疗法。每位患者计划在一周内接收三个治疗课程,允许窗口长达4天。根据患者症状和疼痛强度的变化,每次会议选择六个预定义APS中的六种。主要结果是VAS的安慰剂控制和治疗组之间的平均差异从基线到后续期结束时的变化。结果。患者报告的VAS分数从基线到后续后期(平均9.8天)的分数显着降低8.036点(双面95%CI,-11.841至-4.231)和13.393点(双面95%CI) 17.198至-9.588)分别在治疗和安慰剂对照组。然而,治疗组和安慰剂控制组之间的VAS分数的变化没有显着差异(2.015mm,双面95%CI -5.288至9.317)。结论。试验结果表明,用拔罐治疗或拔罐治疗的PRF热刺激治疗有效地缓解了LBP。 PRF热刺激与拔罐疗法联合的疗效并不优于单独拔罐疗法的疗效。试用登记号码临床研究信息服务(KCT0002137)。该试验于2016年11月10日回顾性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号