首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM >A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Duliang Soft Capsule in Patients with Chronic Daily Headache
【24h】

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Duliang Soft Capsule in Patients with Chronic Daily Headache

机译:多中心,双盲,随机,安慰剂对照试验,以评估Duliang软胶囊在慢性每日头痛患者中的疗效和安全性

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine Duliang soft capsule (DSC) in prophylactic treatment for patients with chronic daily headache (CDH).Methods. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was conducted at 18 Chinese clinical centers. The participants received either DSC or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was headache-free rate (HFR) in a 4-week period between the pretreatment and posttreatment stages. The secondary efficacy measures were the decrease of headache days, the duration of headache attacks, the frequency of analgesic usage, quality of life, disability, and the headache severity (VAS scores). The accompanying symptoms and adverse events were also assessed.Results. Of 584 CDH patients assessed, 468 eligible patients were randomized. 338 patients received DSC, while 111 patients were assigned in the placebo group. Following treatment, there was a 16.56% difference in HFR favoring DSC over placebo (P<0.01). Significant differences were also observed between DSC and placebo groups in the secondary measures. However, no statistical difference was found between the two groups in the associated symptoms. No severe adverse effects were observed in the study.Conclusions. DSC might be an effective and well-tolerated option for the prophylactic treatment of patients with CDH.
机译:客观的。探讨中药Duliang软胶囊(DSC)在预防慢性每日头痛(CDH)患者的疗效治疗中的疗效和安全性.Methods。在18名中国临床中心进行了多中心,双盲,随机的安慰剂对照临床研究。参与者接受了DSC或安慰剂4周。在预处理和后病程之间的4周期内,初级疗效措施是无头痛的速率(HFR)。次要疗效措施是头痛日的降低,头痛攻击的持续时间,镇痛使用频率,寿命质量,残疾和头痛严重程度(VAS分数)。伴随的症状和不良事件也得到了评估。结果。在584例CDH患者中,评估的468名符合条件的患者随机化。 338名患者接受DSC,而111名患者分配在安慰剂组中。治疗后,HFR优化DSC的HFR差异为16.56%(P <0.01)。在二次措施中,DSC和安慰剂组之间还观察到显着差异。然而,在相关症状中两组之间没有发现统计学差异。在研究中没有观察到严重的不利影响。结论。 DSC可能是一种有效且良好的耐受性,可用于预防CDH患者的预防治疗。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号