首页> 外文期刊>Eurosurveillance >Effects of primary care C-reactive protein point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescribing by general practice staff: pragmatic randomised controlled trial, England, 2016 and 2017
【24h】

Effects of primary care C-reactive protein point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescribing by general practice staff: pragmatic randomised controlled trial, England, 2016 and 2017

机译:一般实践人员抗生素规定初级保健C-反应蛋白的影响:务实随机对照试验,英格兰,2016和2017

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background C-reactive protein (CRP) testing can be used as a point-of-care test (POCT) to guide antibiotic use for acute cough. Aim We wanted to determine feasibility and effect of introducing CRP POCT in general practices in an area with high antibiotic prescribing for patients with acute cough and to evaluate patients’ views of the test. Methods We used a McNulty–Zelen cluster pragmatic randomised controlled trial design in general practices in Northern England. Eight intervention practices accepted CRP testing and eight control practices maintained usual practice. Data collection included process evaluation, patient questionnaires, practice audit and antibiotic prescribing data. Results Eight practices with over 47,000 patient population undertook 268 CRP tests over 6 months: 78% of patients had a CRP?&?20?mg/L, 20% CRP 20–100?mg/L and 2% CRP?&?100?mg/L, where 90%, 22% and 100%, respectively, followed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) antibiotic prescribing guidance. Patients reported that CRP testing was comfortable (88%), convenient (84%), useful (92%) and explained well (85%). Patients believed CRP POCT aided clinical diagnosis, provided quick results and reduced unnecessary antibiotic use. Intervention practices had an estimated 21% reduction (95% confidence interval: 0.46–1.35) in the odds of prescribing for cough compared with the controls, a non-significant but clinically relevant reduction. Conclusions In routine general practice, CRP POCT use was variable. Non-significant reductions in antibiotic prescribing may reflect small sample size due to non-use of tests. While CRP POCT may be useful, primary care staff need clearer CRP guidance and action planning according to NICE guidance.
机译:背景技术C反应蛋白(CRP)测试可用作护理点测试(POCT),以指导抗生素用于急性咳嗽。目的我们希望确定对急性咳嗽患者高抗生素规定的一般实践中引入CRP POCT的可行性和效果,并评估患者对测试的看法。方法我们在英格兰北部的一般实践中使用了McNulty-Zelen集群务实随机对照试验设计。八项干预实践接受了CRP测试,并保持了八种控制实践。数据收集包括流程评估,患者问卷,练习审核和抗生素的处方数据。结果超过47,000例患者人口的八种措施超过6个月有超过6个月的CRP试验:78%的患者的CRP?& 20?mg / L,20%CRP 20-100?mg / L和2%CRP? ?100?Mg / L,其中90%,22%和100%,遵循国家健康和护理研究所(漂亮)抗生素的处方指导。患者报告称CRP检测舒适(88%),方便(84%),有用(92%),解释得很好(85%)。患者认为CRP POCT辅助临床诊断,提供了快速的结果和减少不必要的抗生素使用。干预实践估计减少21%(95%置信区间:0.46-1.35),其与对照组规定咳嗽的几率,非重大但临床相关的减少。结论在常规一般实践中,CRP POCT使用是可变的。由于不使用测试,抗生素规定的非显着降低可能反映出小的样品尺寸。虽然CRP POCT可能有用,但根据良好的指导,初级保健人员需要更清晰的CRP指导和行动规划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号