...
首页> 外文期刊>Eurosurveillance >Community use of face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid scoping review
【24h】

Community use of face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: a rapid scoping review

机译:社区使用面部面具和类似的障碍,以防止Covid-19如Covid-19:迅速的审查

获取原文

摘要

Background Evidence for face-mask wearing in the community to protect against respiratory disease is unclear. Aim To assess effectiveness of wearing face masks in the community to prevent respiratory disease, and recommend improvements to this evidence base. Methods We systematically searched Scopus, Embase and MEDLINE for studies evaluating respiratory disease incidence after face-mask wearing (or not). Narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analysis of attack rates for primary and secondary prevention were performed, subgrouped by design, setting, face barrier type, and who wore the mask. Preferred outcome was influenza-like illness. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) quality assessment was undertaken and evidence base deficits described. Results 33 studies (12 randomised control trials (RCTs)) were included. Mask wearing reduced primary infection by 6% (odds ratio (OR):?0.94; 95%?CI:?0.75–1.19 for RCTs) to 61% (OR:?0.85; 95%?CI:?0.32–2.27; OR:?0.39; 95%?CI:?0.18–0.84 and OR:?0.61; 95%?CI:?0.45–0.85 for cohort, case–control and cross-sectional studies respectively). RCTs suggested lowest secondary attack rates when both well and ill household members wore masks (OR:?0.81; 95%?CI:?0.48–1.37). While RCTs might underestimate effects due to poor compliance and controls wearing masks, observational studies likely overestimate effects, as mask wearing might be associated with other risk-averse behaviours. GRADE was low or very low quality. Conclusion Wearing face masks may reduce primary respiratory infection risk, probably by 6–15%. It is important to balance evidence from RCTs and observational studies when their conclusions widely differ and both are at risk of significant bias. COVID-19-specific studies are required.
机译:在社区中穿着面膜以防止呼吸系统疾病的背景证据尚不清楚。旨在评估佩戴脸部面膜在社区中的有效性,以防止呼吸系统疾病,并建议改善本证据基础。方法我们系统地搜索了Scopus,Embase和Medline,用于评估面膜穿着(或不)后的呼吸道疾病发病率。进行叙事合成和随机效应的攻击率进行初级和二级预防的攻击率,由设计,设定,面部屏障类型划分,以及戴上面具的次组。优选的结果是流感样疾病。进行了建议,评估,发展和评估(等级)质量评估和证据基础赤字的评分。结果33研究(12项随机对照试验(RCT))被包括在内。掩模穿着初级感染减少6%(赔率比(或):0.94; 95%?CI:0.75-1.19的RCT)至61%(或:?0.85; 95%?CI:?0.32-2.27;或:?0.39; 95%?CI:?0.18-0.84和或:?0.61; 95%?CI:?分别用于群组,案例控制和横截面研究的0.45-0.85。 rcts建议当井和家庭成员都佩戴面罩时(或:0.81; 95%?CI:?0.48-1.37)。虽然RCT由于持有面罩的遵守和控制较差而导致的效果可能低估,但由于面膜穿着可能与其他风险厌恶行为有关,因此可能会高估效果的观测性研究。等级低或质量很低。结论佩戴面罩可能会降低原发性呼吸道感染风险,可能达到6-15%。当他们的结论差异很大且两者都有显着偏见的风险时,从RCT和观察性研究平衡来自RCT和观察研究的证据非常重要。 Covid-19特定的研究是必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号