首页> 外文期刊>European journal of entomology >Efficiency of two methods of sampling used to assess the abundance and species diversity of adult Syrphidae (Diptera) in mountainous meadows in the Austrian and Swiss Alps
【24h】

Efficiency of two methods of sampling used to assess the abundance and species diversity of adult Syrphidae (Diptera) in mountainous meadows in the Austrian and Swiss Alps

机译:两种抽样方法的效率用于评估奥地利和瑞士阿尔卑斯山区山区草地上成人Syrphidae(Diptera)的丰度和物种多样性

获取原文
       

摘要

The outcome of assessments of the biodiversity of a taxonomic group often depend on the sampling method. The choice of an adequate method is especially important for biomonitoring purposes. In this study, the effectiveness of two methods of sampling syrphids (Diptera: Syrphidae) is compared: observation plot method vs. line transect, both sampled by sweep netting. Altogether, 18 meadows were selected in three mountain regions in the Austrian and Swiss Alps. We recorded a significantly higher abundance and richness of syrphids using the observation plot method than the line transect method in 2015. Comparing data for one region recorded in 2015 and 2016, similar results were obtained. Syrphid species assemblages were affected by sampling method in both years. More syrphid species and individuals were recorded using the observation plot method, which makes it more suitable for studies aiming at comparing differences in the numbers of adult syrphids in different grassland habitats.
机译:分类学基团的生物多样性评估结果通常取决于取样方法。适当方法的选择对生物监测目的尤为重要。在这项研究中,比较了两种采样糖粉(Diptera:Syrphidae)方法的有效性:观察绘图方法与线路横断面,由扫描网采样。在奥地利和瑞士阿尔卑斯山区的三个山区中选择了18种草甸。我们使用观察绘图方法记录了比2015年线路横梁方法的观察图方法显着更高的丰富和丰富性。比较2015年和2016年记录的一个地区的数据,获得了类似的结果。 Syrphid物种组合受到两年内采样方法的影响。使用观察曲线法记录更多的Syrphid物种和个体,这使得更适合于研究不同草地栖息地在成人苜蓿数量的差异的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号