首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Dentistry >iIn Vivo/i Evaluation of Painful Symptomatology after Endodontic Treatment Performed Using Two Different Irrigation Needle Insertion Depths
【24h】

iIn Vivo/i Evaluation of Painful Symptomatology after Endodontic Treatment Performed Using Two Different Irrigation Needle Insertion Depths

机译:在使用两种不同的灌溉针插入深度进行牙髓治疗后疼痛症状学评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective?The main purpose of this study was to evaluate pain symptoms in patients after endodontic treatment performed in a single session in teeth with vitality or pulp necrosis, comparing two depths of insertion of the NaviTip irrigation needle. Materials and Methods?One-hundred upper uniradicular teeth were selected and divided into four groups (n = 25), namely Bio group 1 (live pulp/1 mm from the foramen), Bio group 3 (live pulp/3 mm from the foramen), Necro group 1 (pulp necrosis/1 mm from the foramen), and Necro group 3 (pulp necrosis/3 mm from the foramen). All canals were instrumented with Wave One Gold System. Irrigation was performed using 2.5% NaOCl. The teeth were filled using the single-cone technique with AH Plus sealer using a McSpadden compactor. After treatment, patients answered a questionnaire with a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 10 at 1, 3, and 7 days after treatment. Statistical Analysis?Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Friedman tests. Results?There was a decrease in average pain levels at the three time points for both vital and necrotic teeth (p 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative pain levels comparing needle depth, or vitality and pulp necrosis (p 0.05). The percentage of mild pain increased over time and moderate pain decreased, regardless of pulp condition. There was no incidence of acute pain at any time. Conclusions?Post-treatment endodontic pain levels in upper uniradicular teeth with or without pulp vitality resulted in similar pain scores, regardless of the depth of insertion of the irrigation needle in relation to the apical foramen.
机译:目的?本研究的主要目的是评估患者患者患者患者疼痛症状,在牙齿的单一会议中进行,具有活力或纸浆坏死,比较了Navitip灌溉针的两个深度。材料和方法?选择一百个上外牙齿并分成四组(n = 25),即生物组1(来自孔孔的活纸浆/ 1mm),生物组3(来自孔孔的活纸浆/ 3mm) ),Nec​​ro组1(来自孔的纸浆坏死/ 1mm),和Necro组3(距离孔的纸浆坏死/ 3mm)。所有运河都有一个金系统。使用2.5%NaoCl进行灌溉。使用McSpadden压实机使用具有AH Plus封口机的单锥技术填充牙齿。治疗后,患者在治疗后1,3和7天内评分的视觉模拟规模接受调查问卷。统计分析?使用Mann-Whitney U,Wilcoxon和Friedman Tests进行分析数据。结果?对于生命和坏死牙齿的三个时间点,平均疼痛水平降低(P <0.05)。术后疼痛水平没有显着差异,比较针深度,或活力和纸浆坏死(P> 0.05)。无论牙髓条件如何,温和疼痛的百分比增加,中度疼痛都会降低。随时没有发病率。结论?治疗后牙髓性疼痛水平有或没有纸浆活力导致类似的疼痛评分,无论灌溉针的插入深度与顶端孔的深度如何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号