首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Economics >An Improved CoCoSo Method with a Maximum Variance Optimization Model for Cloud Service Provider Selection
【24h】

An Improved CoCoSo Method with a Maximum Variance Optimization Model for Cloud Service Provider Selection

机译:具有云服务提供商选择的最大方差优化模型的改进的Cocoso方法

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

With the rapid growth of available online cloud services and providers for customers, the selection of cloud service providers plays a crucial role in on-demand service selection on a subscription basis. Selecting a suitable cloud service provider requires a careful analysis and a reasonable ranking method. In this study, an improved combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method is proposed to identify the ranking of cloud service providers. Based on the original CoCoSo method, we analyze the defects of the final aggregation operator in the original CoCoSo method which ignores the equal importance of the three subordinate compromise scores, and employ the operator of "Linear Sum Normalization" to normalize the three subordinate compromise scores so as to make the results reasonable. In addition, we introduce a maximum variance optimization model which can increase the discrimination degree of evaluation results and avoid inconsistent ordering. A numerical example of the trust evaluation of cloud service providers is given to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. Furthermore, we perform sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis to justify the accuracy of the decision outcomes derived by the proposed method. Besides, the results of discrimination test also indicate that the proposed method is more effective than the original CoCoSo method in identifying the subtle differences among alternatives.
机译:随着可用的在线云服务和客户提供商的快速增长,云服务提供商的选择在订阅的按需服务选择中起着至关重要的作用。选择合适的云服务提供商需要仔细分析和合理的排名方法。在本研究中,提出了一种改进的组合折衷解决方法(Cocoso)方法以确定云服务提供商的排名。基于原始的Cocoso方法,我们分析了原始Cocoso方法中最终聚合运算符的缺陷,忽略了三个从属折衷了分数的同等重要性,并采用了“线性和归一化”的运算符来规范化三个从属折衷得分以便使结果合理。此外,我们介绍了最大方差优化模型,可以提高评估结果的辨别程度并避免不一致的订购。给出了云服务提供商的信任评估的数值例证,以证明所提出的方法的适用性。此外,我们进行敏感性分析和比较分析,以证明所提出的方法所衍生的决策结果的准确性。此外,鉴别试验结果还表明该方法比原始的Cocoso方法识别替代方案中的微妙差异更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号