首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Specificity of herbivore‐induced responses in an invasive species, Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed)
【24h】

Specificity of herbivore‐induced responses in an invasive species, Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed)

机译:食草中诱导的侵袭性物种的响应的特异性(鳄鱼杂草)

获取原文
           

摘要

Herbivory‐induced responses in plants can both negatively affect subsequently colonizing herbivores and mitigate the effect of herbivory on the host. However, it is still less known whether plants exhibit specific responses to specialist and generalist herbivores in non‐secondary metabolite traits and how specificity to specialists and generalists differs between invasive and native plant populations. We exposed an invasive plant, Alternanthera philoxeroides , to Agasicles hygrophila (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae; specialist), Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae; generalist), manual clipping, or application of exogenous jasmonic acid and examined both the specificity of elicitation in traits of fitness (e.g., aboveground biomass), morphology (e.g., root:shoot ratio), and chemistry (e.g., C/N ratio and lignin), and specificity of effect on the subsequent performance of A.?hygrophila and S.?litura . Then, we assessed variation of the specificity between invasive and native populations (USA and Argentina, respectively). The results showed S.?litura induced higher branching intensity and specific leaf area but lower C/N ratio than A.?hygrophila , whereas A.?hygrophila induced higher trichome density than S.?litura . The negative effect of induction on subsequent larval growth was greater for S.?litura than for A.?hygrophila . Invasive populations had a weaker response to S.?litura than to A.?hygrophila in triterpenoid saponins and C/N ratio, while native populations responded similarly to these two herbivores. The specific effect on the two herbivores feeding on induced plants did not vary between invasive and native populations. Overall, we demonstrate specificity of elicitation to specialist and generalist herbivores in non‐secondary metabolite traits, and that the generalist is more susceptible to induction than the specialist. Furthermore, chemical responses specific to specialist and generalist herbivores only exist in the invasive populations, consistent with an evolutionary change in specificity in the invasive populations.
机译:在植物中诱导的草本诱导的反应既可以对随后殖民殖民化食草动物并减轻草食病对宿主的影响。然而,它仍然缺乏植物在非次级代谢物特征中对专家和通用食草症表现出特定的反应以及对侵入性和原生植物群体之间的特异性不同的特异性。我们暴露了一种侵入性植物,交替的植物孢子菌(Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae;专家),Spodoptera Litura(鳞翅目,Noctuidae;通用),手动剪裁或外源茉莉酸的应用,并检查了健身性状的特征中的特异性(例如,地上生物量),形态(例如,root:芽比),以及化学(例如,C / N比和木质素),以及对随后的A.? hygrophila和S.?litura的影响的特异性。然后,我们评估了侵入性和本土人群(分别)之间特异性的变化(分别为美国和阿根廷)。结果表明,S.?Litura诱导高度分支强度和特异性叶面积,但比A.?Hygrophila降低C / N比,而A.? hofgrophila诱导比S.?Litura更高的毛状体密度。诱导对随后的幼虫生长的负面影响比A.?Hygrophila更大。侵入性群体对S.?Litura的反应较弱,而不是Triterpenoid Saponins和C / N比的Anfgrophila,而当地人种群与这两种草本病程类似地反应。对诱导植物的两种食草动物的特异性效果在侵入性和原生群中没有变化。总体而言,我们展示了在非次级代谢物特征中对专家和通用食草动物进行诱导的特异性,并且通用主义者比专家更容易归纳。此外,对专家和通用食草动物特异的化学反应仅存在侵入性群体中,符合侵入性群体的特异性的进化变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号