...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >Elective induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management up to 41 weeks in a tertiary care centre
【24h】

Elective induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management up to 41 weeks in a tertiary care centre

机译:在第39周的39周内选择劳动力促进劳动力,在第三级护理中心最多41周

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The timing of delivery and effective management of labour at term makes a huge difference in the obstetric and perinatal outcome. There have always been controversies between choosing the elective induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management up to 41/42 weeks which can result in placental ageing, reduced liquor, non-assuring fetal heart tracings, meconium stained amniotic fluid and fetal macrosomia. our objective was to perform a comparative effectiveness analysis of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks gestational age among nulliparous women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies as compared to expectant management up to 41 weeks. Methods: 120 primigravidae with singleton pregnancies with fetus in cephalic presentation were recruited into the study and divided into 2 groups of 60 each A: Patients were induced electively using dinoprostone gel (maximum 3 doses 8 hours apart) B: They were managed expectantly up to 41 weeks allowing for spontaneous onset of labour, induction or cesarean section was done for obstetric indications between 39 and 41 weeks and pregnancy was terminated by induction for those who continued up to 41 weeks. Their obstetric and perinatal outcome were noted. Results: The cesarean section rates were higher in the expectantly managed group (21%) when compared to the electively induced group (16%). The same was with instrumental delivery rates (15% versus 10%). The perinatal outcome was poorer for the expectantly managed group with 20% NICU admissions and 5% perinatal deaths compared to the electively induced group which had 12% NICU admissions and 3.3% perinatal deaths. The expectantly managed group also resulted in respiratory distress in a larger number of fetuses and resulted in problems due to reduced liquor. Conclusions: Elective induction at 39 weeks gestational age was found to be a better option compared to expectant management up to 41 weeks in terms of obstetric and perinatal outcomes.
机译:背景:递送和有效管理的劳动力管理的时间在产科和围产期结果中产生了巨大差异。在39周内选择劳动力的选修诱导与预期管理有41/42周之间一直存在争议,这可能导致胎盘衰老,减少酒,无令胎儿心脏描记,染色的羊水液和胎儿麦克风。我们的目的是在患有简单的单身怀孕的血腥妇女的妊娠期妊娠期妊娠期年龄的孕孕量,与预期管理高达41周,患有短发妇女的妊娠期年龄的69周孕孕比较有效性分析。方法:招募120例血对妊娠的胎儿妊娠,患有头颅介绍中的胎儿,分为2例60组:患者用Dinoprostone凝胶举出诱导(最多3小时相隔8小时)B:它们预期管理41周,允许自发发作的劳动,诱导或剖宫产,在309至41周之间进行产科指示,并通过遗传持续41周的遗传终止妊娠。注意到他们的产科和围产期结果。结果:与选修组(16%)相比,预期管理组的剖宫产率较高(21%)。这同样具有乐器交付率(15%与10%)。围产期结果对于预期的管理组较差,预期的尼古尔入学群和5%的围产期死亡率与选修诱导的小组相比,尼古尔入学12%和围产期死亡3.3%。预期的管理组也导致胎儿较数较多的呼吸窘迫,导致由于较低的酒而导致问题。结论:与产科和围产期结果的预期管理相比,39周的选修诱导是一个更好的选择,最多可期待41周。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号