...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology >A study on patterns of needle - stick injuries among gynaecologic and general surgeons in open surgery
【24h】

A study on patterns of needle - stick injuries among gynaecologic and general surgeons in open surgery

机译:开放手术中的脑病和普通外科医生尖粘损伤模式研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: An estimated 3,84,000 percutaneous injuries are reported by HCW in hospitals in the United States each year, placing them at risk of exposure to HIV, HBV, or HCV. Suture needles have been identified as the most frequent cause of injury. They are involved in as many as 44% of such injuries. This study is designed to note the NSI in major gynaecological procedures and surgical procedures using conventional method (CM) versus (VS) use of HK. Methods: Study was conducted over a period of 12 months from January 2017 to December 2017. 60 patients were included in this study and were divided into 2 groups A and B with 30 patients in each group. Group A was major surgery performed by conventional method; Group B was major surgery performed by using harmonic knife. NSI in two groups were studied and analyzed. Results: Most of the operated patients were between 41-50 years age group. 16.6% procedures were emergency and 83.3% were elective. NSI in conventional surgery was 63.3% in the surgeon and 33.3% with harmonic knife. There were 13.3% NSI in first assistant in conventional surgery and 23.3% in harmonic scalpel group. No such injuries were reported by second assistant in either group. Injuries were more in non-dominant hand in either groups in the surgeon and first assistant. Conclusions: It is concluded that NSI are common in surgeons and first assistant. Such injuries are more in non-dominant hand and in procedures where there is little exposure like vaginal hysterectomy. Use of innovative technologies like harmonic scalpel may be useful.
机译:背景:HCW每年在美国的医院中报告了估计的3,84,000次经皮伤害,将它们视为接触艾滋病毒,HBV或HCV的风险。缝合针被识别为最常见的伤害原因。他们参与了这项伤害的多达44%。本研究旨在使用常规方法(CM)与HK的主要妇科手术和外科手术中的NSI;方法:研究于2017年1月至2017年12月在12个月内进行。该研究中包含60名患者,分为2组A和B,每组30名患者。 A组是通过常规方法进行的主要手术; B组是通过使用谐波进行的主要手术。研究和分析了两组的NSI。结果:大多数经营患者在41-50岁之间。 16.6%的程序是紧急情况,而83.3%是选举值。常规手术中的NSI在外科医生中为63.3%,谐波刀33.3%。常规手术中的第一助助手中有13.3%的NSI,谐波手术刀组中的23.3%。两种助手没有报告这种伤害。在外科医生和第一助手中的任何群体中,伤害更多地在非显着手中。结论:结论是,NSI在外科医生和第一助手中很常见。这种伤害在非主导手和手术中更少,在那里几乎没有曝光的阴道子宫切除术。使用谐波手术刀等创新技术可能是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号